Jim, Regarding instability at long natural periods: For your information and encouragement, I would like to point out that when the WWNSS (Worldwide network of standardized seismograph stations) was first deployed, the horizontal long period (LP) seismometers (Sprengnether 5100s) were set at 30 seconds period. But after about a year, it became evident that this resulted in many against the stops for much of the time, in spite of being an elegant instrument installed on massive piers in carefully designed vaults (with notable exceptions). So the standard period for the long-period WWNSS was set to 15 seconds. Recording was done with a 90-second galvanometer on photographic paper. The seis, galvo, and coupling/attenuation network impedances were 500 ohms. So I would also suggest that strong over-damping coupled with a good amplifier can achieve a similar result as a much longer period, since over-damping makes a somewhat broad response, but at reduced output, hence the need for a proper amplifier, especially one with very low input offset current, since such currents WILL flow through the signal coil of the seis and push the mass around. These alone may cause substantial apparent drift of the mass position. In two stations where I am currently operating LP seismometers (with natural periods set to 15 seconds), I am damping them with 500 ohms (the same as the coil resistance), which is a damping coefficient of 2 times critical. I am using the amplifier posted on the web site. With no galvanometer, the response is fairly broadband from 10 hz to 25 seconds. Regards, Sean-Thomas PS: You have not mentioned the thermal protection that you are providing for your seismometer. Even the large 5100 LP seismometers have 4" to 8" of insulation. I use an indoor/outdoor thermometer to monitor the instrument temperature, which changes no more than 1 degree C / week, and about 1/10th that per day. PS2: I notice that you mention moving your boom 1" off center to measure the period. This may result in major non-linearities in the restoring forces that control the period. The period is rarely measured visually; when it is, displacements of less than a mm are used, and a magnifying reticule is used to time the zero crossings going in the same direction (a full cycle of motion represents the period). Preferably an oscilloscope or the seismic digitizer is used to measure the period from the output of the moving coil, using very small displacements. It may be that your period is actually much longer than what you get by moving it 1". _____________________________________________________________________ Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
Larry Cochrane <cochrane@..............>