To whom it may interest
I have been reading the comments on gravitation with great interest and it
started me wondering about plumb lines and if at certain locations
(assuming no interference/vibration) they hang truly vertical all the time
- i.e. pointing directly through the centre of the earth, and even change
due the core rotating at a different speed to the crust. Likewise if a
skyscraper is truly vertical at one moment, could it not be vertical at
another time as compared with a plumb line... I know the amount by which it
would be out of plumb would be so insignificant as not to matter in the
real world.
I enjoy reading the discussions that the group put up and one day, GV, I
hope to take a more active role in the earth sciences
------------
Ted Rogers.
----------
> From: Tom Schmitt
> To: psn-l@..............
> Subject: Re: Article on gravimeters
> Date: Monday, May 01, 2000 4:40 AM
>
> John
>
> About fifteen years ago I went to a non-classified briefing about a land
> version of a gravity gradiometer. The Defense Mapping Agency had it.
>
> It was in a Winabago of some sort and had three disks that rotated at a
> fairly low rpm, a few Hz at most. The disks were less than a meter in
> diameter. The disks had two accelerometers on them. The acceleration
as a
> function of position of the two accelerometers was reccorded and some
sort
> of auto-correlation or FFT was done to get the direction and magnitude of
> the gradient.
>
> It was cute.
>
>
> Tom Schmitt
>
> tschmitt@..............
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Hernlund
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2000 10:58 PM
> Subject: Re: Article on gravimeters
> > > George Bush
> >
> > George,
> > There was a horribly written article about an incredibly interesting
> > subject a few years back in Scientific American. Even though the
article
> did
> > not belong in the magazine, you might be interested in reading it. It
was
> > about a gravity gradiometer that had been designed to help submarines
> "see"
> > the topography on the ocean floor and avoid collision with sea mounts.
> They
> > needed a passive method to see the ocean floor so that they would not
be
> > detected. Supposedly this thing worked great (too bad all the data
they
> > collected is classified). Anyways, the company that made it was
allowed
> to
> > contract its use out to some geophysical concerns, such as finding oil
and
> > natural gas resevoirs. The company takes a huge amount of money,
throws
> this
> > thing in a boat and drives around for a while. They take the data,
reduce
> it,
> > and then sell portions of it for commercial use. Nobody is allowed to
buy
> > one of these instruments, or use one for themselves. This is the
reason
> it
> > did not belong in the magazine: it was really an ad for the company.
The
> > exact technology is still classified, so it is like a magical black
box.
> >
> > Anyways, this device produces higher resolution images for finding
> density
> > anomalies than seismic methods, and does not require a whole lot of
fancy
> > deployment except for position tracking and recording instruments, and
so
> is a
> > lot easier to use than seismic arrays. I found this hard to believe
when
> I
> > first heard it, but then again I was only used to absolute vertical
> gravity
> > measurements. So I had to find out about it a little further.
> >
> > The gravity gradient is the change in the gravity for each direction
> (down,
> > east, north) within a given distance and with respect to each
direction.
> So
> > the downward component of gravity changes differently in the down, east
> and
> > west directions, and likewise for the east and north components of
> gravity.
> > This makes nine different combinations of gradients that can be
examined.
> One
> > of those nine components can tell you an awful lot more than an
absolute
> > gravity measurement, so just imagine having nine of them. Well, it
turns
> out
> > that some of the components are equal, and the total number of unique
> > components is reduced to six. For example, the change in the down
> component
> > of gravity with respect to north is equal to the change in the north
> component
> > of gravity with respect to the down direction. In addition, the three
> terms
> > where the component changes in each of its directions is regulated by
the
> fact
> > that a gravitational field is divergenceless, which means these three
> > gradients must sum to 0. So that makes five unique components, from
which
> the
> > other four can be determined. All nine components are referred to as
the
> > "gravity gradient tensor."
> >
> > This machine is supposed to have rotatiing parts and sensors inside
> some
> > kind of black spherical shell. It is very mysterious, and I would love
to
> see
> > inside one some day. I am sure everyone else would be interested
too...
> I
> > guess I would have to hijack one of their ships or something if I
wanted
> to
> > get it, but that won't happen any time soon. Perhaps the PSN could
mount
> an
> > expedition, and the media would try and figure out if PSN stood for
some
> kind
> > of terrorist organization or something.
> >
> > Anyhow, enjoy!
> >
> > John Hernlund
> > E-mail: hernlund@.......
> > WWW: http://www.public.asu.edu/~hernlund/
> >
> >
>
****************************************************************************
> **
> >
> > __________________________________________________________
> >
> > Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
> >
> > To leave this list email PSN-L-REQUEST@.............. with
> > the body of the message (first line only): unsubscribe
> > See http://www.seismicnet.com/maillist.html for more information.
>
> __________________________________________________________
>
> Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
>
> To leave this list email PSN-L-REQUEST@.............. with
> the body of the message (first line only): unsubscribe
> See http://www.seismicnet.com/maillist.html for more information.
__________________________________________________________
Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
Larry Cochrane <cochrane@..............>