Tom, Sean-Thomas Morrissey, has a lot more experience with force-balance devices and can probably add a lot to what I could say, but I'll be happy to offer a few comments. At 10:47 AM 6/20/2000 -0400, you wrote: >Question > >I am considering building a force balance seismometer. I have some >questions> > >(1) The recommended position sensor is a capacitive bridge, the details are >on the Uni-Stuttgart geophysics page. Has anyone on the list done this? If >so what problems, or more importantly, what solutions, ;) , evolved. I haven't used one, yet, but that's the way I'm leaning. Sean-Thomas prefers the Variable Reluctance Differential Transducer, VRDT. Although the ultimate performance of the capacitance bridge is probably better, I think your chances of getting a VRDT design working well are likely to be much greater. For more info.on the capacitive bridge, try to find "Capacitive Sensors" by Larry K. Baxter IEEE press 1997. He thoroughly covers the real-world issues and circuit designs and he gives a good idea of what's involved in making capacitive sensors work up to their potential. >(2) How important is linearity of the spring? My daughter asked me why we >didn't float a beam using opposing magnets. That is a F = k(r^3) force to >distance relationship and the perfect seismometer spring would have F = >k(r). For vanishingly small displacements do the problems go away? Linearity isn't likely to be a fundamental problem in a force-balance device, since, as you mentioned, the displacements will be relatively small. By far the larger problem is variation in the restoring force with temperature and time. Most permanent magnets are not very temperature stable. Even a steel spring isn't all that great, and you would need to keep the rates of temperature change well below the longest period you wanted to observe in order to avoid seeing large amounts of temperature-change noise. >(3) I seem to remember someone has a source of material for zero force >hinges. Is it still available and who has it? Try McMaster-Carr at http://www.mcmaster.com/ Then search on "shim stock" I'm not sure, but I don't think they have any order minimum. The thickness and material would depend on how much force the hinge would have to resist. In general, the thinner, the better. I had been playing with trying to see just how far you can go in making a hinge with minimal (zero) restoring force at: http://members.home.net/nordgren/ on the downloads page. In that design, the one area I'm still not completely comfortable with is just how good it would be at resisting sideways rotation of the beam. As a practical matter, any well-designed crossed-flexure hinge would probably work just fine. Regards, Brett __________________________________________________________ Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
Larry Cochrane <cochrane@..............>