I just wanted to bring up two points. Please re-read my suggestion that you add some series impedance to the lines at the entrance to your pre-amp and then do your bypassing. This has a two-fold purpose =96 it increases the series impedance from the antenna structure formed by the seismo lead-in wires so that the bypass caps you use don=92t have large circulating current in them. This helps if the ground structure of the preamp area is not real good. Secondly it allows a higher attenuation in the single section lo-pass you=92re attempting to create. In many instances, the attenuation is the ratio of the capacitance of the lead-in wires to ground, some hundreds of pF probably in your case, to the bypass cap value. With the use of a resistor, this value becomes a pF or two, making possible higher attenuation ratios. The second point is where Chris Chapman did a brief field strength calculation in part and wrote: =93This gives E =3D 0.23 V / m=94 This i= s OK as far as it went, the point I want to make is, that in practice, this near (2 miles) to the station, the AC power lines play a big part in the perceived signal levels. Think about how AM radio fades in and out as you approach power lines sometimes. So if you=92re on the same AC feeder line, you can have considerably higher levels. A simple test is to take just about any meter, put it on the AC scale, and measure from your preamp ground to the seismo lead-in wires. The AC voltage measured is almost certainly due to the broadcast station. Just about any meter should work, as it takes effort to cut-off the frequency response in the AM radio band. Charles R. Patton __________________________________________________________ Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
Larry Cochrane <cochrane@..............>