Steve Hammond wrote:
>
> Has anybody incorporated a BasicStamp micro in the
> construction of their seismograph, tools, amplifiers,
> or A/D?
> Regards, Steve Hammond -- PSN Aptos, California
About 10 years ago I got tired of re-leveling a
garden-gate type seismograph (a one vertical post "Lehman")
that was more stable than its base. (A machine adjusted
to 20 second period on a house slab needs daily
re-leveling in changeable weather.)
I used the BasicStamp to:
a) send a re-leveling indication to the ADC
b) short the sense coil
c) turn on 2 infra-red LEDs used to help sense the pendulum position
d) sense the relative outputs of two infra-red photo cells
using an RC circuit BasicStamp AtoD recommended at the time
e) operate a highly geared down stepping motor to
move the leveling more toward nominal pendulum position
f) undo c) above, then b), then a)
g) go back to sleep for a day
Results of the experiment.
a) BasicStamp ALMOST had the drive to operate the
stepping motor reliably - had to go to higher current
drive to gain 100% drive reliability
b) photo sensing using the old recommended BasicStamp
circuit is a bitch !!
- temperature sensitivity
- sensitivity to ambient light
- sensitivity to everything
even using differential circuitry did not yield
the kind of reliability and stability and
demonstratability that I wanted.
Then I discovered the Internet,
and my interests changed.
If I were going to do it again -
a) more conventional AtoD than offered
by the old BasicStamp - like a real amplifier
and a real ADC (or a more modern BasicStamp?)
b) pay more attention to the optics so that I
can show the thing working to my friends
in normal light.
or
c) tap into the data from a professionally
operated machine installed in a quiet location
(2000 miles from a sea coast OR install a
0.2 to 0.1 Hertz notch filter).
Cheers
Ed Thelen - Fremont, CA ethelen@........
__________________________________________________________
Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
Larry Cochrane <cochrane@..............>