PSN-L Email List Message

Subject: Re: Shipping giant tubular objects
From: Mark Robinson other@...............
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 13:20:14 +1200


Doug Crice wrote:
> 
> Clever.
> 
> I wasn't totally clear in my suggestion.  I meant that one pallet could
> go to Denver, one to SFO, one to LAX, one to St Louis, etc.  Perhaps
> even one to Italy and one to New Zealand 

now you are talking .... 40.883 south 175.067 west ... I will dig the
hole now. At last a proper use for cruise missile technology.

regards all

Mark

(those would cost a little
> more).  Sooner or later, they're gonna get shipped, why not spread them
> around?
> 
> Doug
> 
> Thomas W Leiper wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 30 Apr 2001 16:17:38 -0700 Doug Crice 
> > writes:
> > > Gentlemen:
> > [edited]
> > > Standard air freight probably would be the least destructive and is
> > > often much cheaper than truck.
> >
> > That depends on what booster you use. With their rugged
> > SS construction and built in inertial platform these sound like
> > they would be perfect for sub-orbital delivery to anybody
> > within a thousand miles. The key is to find some surplus
> > JATO units and get down some test firings to determine
> > trajectory, winds aloft and maximum range.
> >
> > Scotty, give me the coordinates.
> >
> > Tom
__________________________________________________________

Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)


[ Top ] [ Back ] [ Home Page ]

Larry Cochrane <cochrane@..............>