There is no reason why the resolution could not be better, if one could resolve, say, the difference between the center of the beam being directly on a particular pixel, or some fraction of the way between two pixels. Just a thought. The proof will be in the seismogram produced! John At 05:41 AM 5/31/2001 , Jim H. wrote: > In the case of Kodaks biggest 14000 pixels less than 12 bits of > resolution. This is truly a not so simple solution. John C. Lahr 1925 Foothills Road Golden, CO 80402 Phone: (303) 215-9913 john@........ http://lahr.org/john-jan/science.html __________________________________________________________ Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
Larry Cochrane <cochrane@..............>