PSN-L Email List Message

Subject: Re: "EPICS" seismo suggestion
From: Thomas W Leiper twleiper@........
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 18:37:34 -0400


Seems to be an all-out nuclear exchange between academicians...

Let me know when the radiation has dropped top safe levels so I can
come up from the bomb shelter and survey the wasteland. Maybe I'll
even offer up how to make an incredible, virtually unlimited dynamic
range, drift-free capacitive force-balanced system for peanuts.

Tom

On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:19:17 EDT ChrisAtUpw@....... writes:
[edited for maximum impact]    
There is NO PROBLEM in this case. Didn't you check the data sheet? 
????? I am definitely NOT Roger Baker and this is definitely NOT a
magnetometer application! 
While this may be very interesting, how is it relevant to an A3515
magnetic sensor, please? 
Can you provide any experimental noise and thermal stability measurements
for such a system, to back up your 'vote' decision,
While this is fine for airbag control on cars, seismic sensor
applications require a greater dynamic range. 
With these limitations, how do you suggest that the MS3110 could be
=EF=BB=BF




Seems to be an all-out nuclear exchange between academicians...
 
Let me know when the radiation has dropped top safe levels so I can
come up from the bomb shelter and survey the wasteland. Maybe=20 I'll
even offer up how to make an incredible, virtually unlimited=20 dynamic
range, drift-free capacitive force-balanced system for peanuts.
 
Tom
 
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:19:17 EDT ChrisAtUpw@....... writes:
[edited for maximum=20 impact]    
There is NO PROBLEM in = this case.=20 Didn't you check the data sheet? 
????? I am definitely NOT Roger= =20 Baker and this is definitely NOT a magnetometer application! 
= While=20 this may be very interesting, how is it relevant to an A3515 magnetic = sensor,=20 please? 
Can you provide any experimental noise and thermal = stability=20 measurements for such a system, to back up your 'vote'=20 decision,
While this is fine for = airbag=20 control on cars, seismic sensor applications require a greater dynamic=20 range. 
With these limitations, how do you suggest that the = MS3110=20 could be applied to our amateur seismic equipment, please?
<= FONT=20 face=3Darial,helvetica>

[ Top ] [ Back ] [ Home Page ]