PSN-L Email List Message
Subject: Re: "EPICS" seismo suggestion
From: meredithlamb meredithlamb@.............
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 22:24:52 -0600
Hi Charles and all,
Actually the A3515 Hall sensor, exhibits no gauss or magnetic
attraction (with no power on) that I could see either with a
strong magnet or a gaussmeter set on its most sensitive scale here.
However, some other Hall brand varieties do, as do probably a heavy
majority of other use, IC's....especially their tinned iron leads.
I've no idea of what a Hall with "power on" could significant
influence; but I'd guess its very minor.
"Charles R. Patton" wrote:
> Aa a sensor solution for the SG seimo, it was proposed to use "…a $1.83
> A3515LUA sensor…"
>
> So this brings up this thought: Most standard IC frames are magnetic -
> consisting of a Kovar frame. And magnetic sensors in particular are
> often constructed with "magnetic concentrators" to focus magnetic flux
> on to the sensitive area of the chip. Both make the chip physically
> attracted to ambient fields. If the chip is not mounted on the SG arm,
> then the magnets must be, which would be even worse about ambient
> sensitivity. So if one goes for the higher sensitivity of the SG,
> doesn't this create problems in terms of an actual physical sensitivity
> to the surrounding changing magnetic fields?
The Hall would have to be mounted on the boom/mass "normally" of course.
It would help to have some Hall shielding (mainly for immediate area
"noise") in any S-G with a Hall sensor yes....but I don't think its
absolutely essential even there. Years ago, Robert showed me the
results of shielding versus no shielding with a small old oscilloscope
shield tube....it cut the noise about in half.
> I'm thinking back to some
> experiments that Roger Baker did on magnetometers in which his
> magnetometer is actually a magnet on a torsion balance. He said he
> could detect a small magnet many feet away and I know he could sense
> geomagnetic changes. It would seem to me that would turn the SG seismo
> into a geomagnetic field detector. Roger's detectors were based on
> photodetectors and LED or Laser LED sources.
Yes, having a suspended magnet mass does react to external magnetic
changes....even solar origin flares which can make for magnetic
pole/s or earth area variations. I have a separate such instrument
of this nature (diamagnetically levitated magnet)....its better
for some stronger solar field changes detection...or passing
buses/trucks (ha) than the occasional seismic results I'am sure.
I guess you could also call it a "metal" detector of sorts (ha).
It can be interesting in itself, but one really needs a remote
vault...and not in the city as I am located.
> I think I'd vote for the original SG variable capacitance detector.
> Today you can buy ICs which do all the detection. For one source see
> "Universal Capacitive ReadoutTM IC (MS3110)" at:
> http://www.microsensors.com/products.html
> I don't know how much it costs, but in volume this can't be that
> expensive. I also know there is at least a couple of European companies
> that makes a similar IC.
>
> Just some idle musings.
Of course, the old coil and magnet sensor approach is the ultimate in
simplicity forever it seems......but even there, finding/making
or buying a "very good" sensitive coil is the hardest part I suggest.
Have to go along with the dual magnet (4 pole) approach that Chris
noted also, it seems to increase the coil sensitivity some rough ~
2 times over that of a single magnet. Adding another attracting
4 pole magnet on the side of the coil (via a normal garden gate
seismo), raises the sensitivity higher to about 4-6 times of a single
magnet. Such magnets also seem to do well with eddy current damping
schemes also. Of course the best coil magnet scheme is with a
"speaker" type setup, but for most amateurs, its really tough to
do this.
Don't know "absolutely" for sure, but I think its hard to beat a Hall
setup for being about the cheapest "general", and reliable seismo one
could have with all cost aspects considered.
Take care, Meredith Lamb
__________________________________________________________
Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
[ Top ]
[ Back ]
[ Home Page ]