Jim,
I can help you with my address at least:
Larry Conklin
105 Riverglen Rd.
Liverpool, NY 13090
lconklin@............
Larry
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Connie and Jim Lehman=20
To: psn-l@.................
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 7:33 AM
Subject: Short Period Vertical/ Geophones??
C. Patton, A. Hrubetz, & J. Lahr--your copies of the short period =
design are in the mail. =20
I need some help on mailing addresses for S. Hammond, L. Conklin & =
F. Cooper---
Thanks Chris for your comments on geophones. I remember showing =
the short period vertical design to a geophysicist who had considerable =
experience in exploration using geophones. He said--"Why not use a =
geophone?" We got hold of several used discards in good condition and =
tried them. They are "strong motion" in nature, but with todays =
amplification one can adapt. The units we had were periods less than a =
1 second, and were underdamped for our purposes. We wanted parameters =
to match the 1 second vertical Springnether (sp) professional sensor the =
Geology Dept. was using at that time--for comparison purposes. We never =
pursued the idea further--but felt it had possibilities.
No doubt there are persons out there like Chris that have had =
some experience with geophones. They are compact--a neat package and =
reasonably economical--a quick way to go vertical-- if you can adapt the =
parameters to be within the wishes of an amateur seismologist.
=
Season's Best---Jim Lehman
=
=20
Jim,
I can help you with my address at =
least:
Larry Conklin
105 Riverglen Rd.
Liverpool, NY 13090
lconklin@............
Larry
----- Original Message -----
From:=20
Connie and=20
Jim Lehman
Sent: Saturday, December 21, =
2002 7:33=20
AM
Subject: Short Period Vertical/ =
Geophones??
C. Patton, A. =
Hrubetz, & J.=20
Lahr--your copies of the short period design are in the mail. =20
I need =
some help=20
on mailing addresses for S. Hammond, L. Conklin & F.=20
Cooper---
=
Thanks Chris=20
for your comments on geophones. I remember showing the short =
period=20
vertical design to a geophysicist who had considerable experience in=20
exploration using geophones. He said--"Why not use a =
geophone?" We=20
got hold of several used discards in good condition and tried =
them. =20
They are "strong motion" in nature, but with todays =
amplification one=20
can adapt. The units we had were periods less than a 1 second, =
and were=20
underdamped for our purposes. We wanted parameters to match the =
1 second=20
vertical Springnether (sp) professional sensor the Geology Dept. was =
using at=20
that time--for comparison purposes. We never pursued the idea=20
further--but felt it had possibilities.
No=20
doubt there are persons out there like Chris that have had some =
experience=20
with geophones. They are compact--a neat package and reasonably=20
economical--a quick way to go vertical-- if you can adapt the =
parameters to be=20
within the wishes of an amateur seismologist.
&nbs=
p;  =
; =
&=
nbsp; &n=
bsp; =20
Season's Best---Jim Lehman
&nbs=
p;  =
; =
&=
nbsp; &n=
bsp; &nb=
sp; =20
[ Top ]
[ Back ]
[ Home Page ]