PSN-L Email List Message

Subject: Re: Notes to UK--Nick
From: "Mauro Mariotti" mariotti@.........
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:15:35 +0100


Hi,
yes, I am gree.
The simple design of the lacoste suspension should be
considered instead of a simple vertical spring.
I experimented several solution and i what i learned
the Lacoste suspension is the easier and better solution
for a homemade design.

Anyway the interesting life of seismo-amateurs is the=20
ability to experiments many solutions...
so all the ideas are always welcome!

regards
Mauro
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Jack Ivey=20
  To: psn-l@.................
  Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 3:33 PM
  Subject: RE: Notes to UK--Nick


  Mauro,
  I'm not sure it will be _very_ sensitive to axial movements.  =
Horizontal
  movements of the magnet will not cause as much change in magnetic=20
  flux linkage through the coil as vertical movements because of the =
geometry
  of the coil and magnet.  For movement in one horizontal direction, the =
magnet
  is moving parallel to the wires at the top of the coil.  For the other =
horizontal
  direction, the magnet is moving parallel to the flux between it's =
poles.  In either
  case any flux change through the coil is a second order effect due to =
curvature
  of the coil and curvature of the magnet path.  For vertical movement =
the flux=20
  change is a first order effect, proportional to displacement.  As a =
guess I=20
  would expect the horizontal sensitivity to be 5x to 10x down from the =
vertical. =20

  Jack
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Mauro Mariotti [mailto:mariotti@..........
    Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 2:01 PM
    To: psn-l@..............
    Subject: Re: Notes to UK--Nick


    Hi all,
    I suggest a different approach for homemade vertical sensors.
    The sensor in the link you propose is VERY sensitive to axial =
movements
    (horizontal movements)
    if you give a look to=20

    http://www.infoeq.it/doc02v_e.htm=20

    and scroll the page until you reach:

    Lacoste suspension sensor=20

    you can see a good approach to a sensitive=20
    long period seismometer.

    There are also sofisticated tecniques to=20
    have a virtually infinite response for that kind
    of seismometer using a "zero length spring".

    Mr Lacoste writed a lot of paper on it.
    Chris Chapman is better documented on this point.
    I hope to have the time to publish an abstract on these tecnmiques
    but any clever mind can understand how the Lacoste suspension
    is great and simple to build.

    Regards
    Mauro



      ----- Original Message -----=20
      From: John & Jan Lahr=20
      To: psn-l@.................
      Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 6:47 PM
      Subject: Re: Notes to UK--Nick


      I've scanned Jim's Short Period design plans and put a copy on my =
web site here:
      http://jjlahr.com/science/psn/lehman/
      This will save on postage and make the plans available to more =
people.  They
      are a good example of how to document a seismic sensor design.

      Happy New Year,
      John



      At 12:15 PM 12/28/2002, you wrote:

        Nick--I do not need an e-mail address.  I only needed your =
mailing address to send the "Short Period" design plans.
           The plans were mailed airmail  to U.K. 2 days before =
Christmas.
           A good New Year to you and all the PSN group.
                                      J. Lehman.







Hi,
yes, I am gree.
The simple design of the lacoste = suspension should=20 be
considered instead of a simple vertical = spring.
I experimented several solution and i = what i=20 learned
the Lacoste suspension is the easier = and better=20 solution
for a homemade design.
 
Anyway the interesting life of = seismo-amateurs is=20 the
ability to experiments many=20 solutions...
so all the ideas are always = welcome!
 
regards
Mauro
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Jack = Ivey
To: psn-l@..............
Sent: Thursday, January 02, = 2003 3:33=20 PM
Subject: RE: Notes to = UK--Nick

Mauro,
I'm=20 not sure it will be _very_ sensitive to axial movements. =20 Horizontal
movements of the magnet will not cause as much change in = magnetic=20
flux=20 linkage through the coil as vertical movements because of the = geometry
of=20 the coil and magnet.  For movement in one horizontal = direction,=20 the magnet
is moving parallel to the wires at the = top of=20 the coil.  For the other=20 horizontal
direction, the magnet is moving parallel to = the flux=20 between it's poles.  In = either
case any flux change through the coil is a = second=20 order effect due to curvature
of the coil and curvature of the magnet=20 path.  For vertical=20 movement the flux=20
change is a first order effect, = proportional to=20 displacement.  As a=20 guess I=20
would expect = the horizontal=20 sensitivity to be 5x to 10x down = from the=20 vertical. 
 
Jack
-----Original Message-----
From: Mauro Mariotti=20 [mailto:mariotti@..........
Sent: Monday, December 30, = 2002 2:01=20 PM
To: psn-l@..............
Subject: Re: Notes = to=20 UK--Nick

Hi all,
I suggest a different approach = for homemade=20 vertical sensors.
The sensor in the link you = propose is VERY=20 sensitive to axial movements
(horizontal = movements)
if you give a = look to=20
 
http://www.infoeq.it/doc02v_e.= htm=20
 
and scroll the page until you=20 reach:
 
Lacoste suspension = sensor=20
 
you can see a good approach to a = sensitive=20
long period = seismometer.
 
There are also sofisticated = tecniques to=20
have a virtually infinite = response for that=20 kind
of seismometer using a "zero = length=20 spring".
 
Mr Lacoste writed a lot of paper = on=20 it.
Chris Chapman is better = documented on this=20 point.
I hope to have the time to = publish an=20 abstract on these tecnmiques
but any clever mind can = understand how the=20 Lacoste suspension
is great and simple to = build.
 
Regards
Mauro
 
 
 
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 John = & Jan=20 Lahr
Sent: Monday, December 30, = 2002 6:47=20 PM
Subject: Re: Notes to = UK--Nick

I've scanned Jim's Short Period design plans and = put a copy=20 on my web site here:
http://jjlahr.com/science/psn/lehman/
This = will=20 save on postage and make the plans available to more people.  = They
are a good example of how to document a seismic sensor=20 design.

Happy New Year,
John



At 12:15 PM=20 12/28/2002, you wrote:
Nick--I do not=20 need an e-mail address.  I only needed your mailing address = to send=20 the "Short Period" design plans.
   The=20 plans were mailed airmail  to U.K. 2 days before=20 Christmas.
   A good New Year = to you=20 and all the PSN group.
          &nbs= p;            = ;      =20 J.=20 Lehman.
=

[ Top ] [ Back ] [ Home Page ]