PSN-L Email List Message

Subject: Re: Op amp front end noise
From: ChrisAtUpw@.......
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:33:08 EST


 
In a message dated 10/03/2005 16:11:50 GMT Standard Time,  jpopelish@........ 
writes:

Jack  Ivey wrote:
> Bret Nordgren wrote:
>> Another factor that you  may want to consider is thermal variation.  At 
very
>> low  frequencies, below 1Hz, the effects of micro-variations in the  device
>> temperature can add additional "noise". 

> I've  seen this effect with thermocouple amplifiers, where moving your hand
>  near the circuit would move the air enough to create low-frequency  noise.
> It can be almost eliminated by pressing the circuit board  between pieces
> of foam rubber.

It also helps a lot to keep the  internal temperature rise of the front
end opamp to a minimum.   Reducing the opamp supply voltage as much as
possible without degrading the  performance of the amp helps keep the
chip cool and reduce the thermal  effect of changes in air currents.

For this reason, if two amp choices  have similar noise specs, but one
may be operated at lower supply voltage  or draws less supply current,
its lower self heating may allow it to out  perform its hotter
competition in the low frequency  realm.



Hi John,
 
    Assuming that you are using a 16 bit ADC with a  range of +/-10V, one 
count is 305 micro volts. Normal amplifier gains can result  in very significant 
count drifts with temperature unless great care is taken in  the design and 
construction.
 
        There are two different  factors operating here. One is the 
temperature sensitivity of the opamp input  circuit in micro V / C Deg. Remember that 
this relates to temperatures  on the IC chip itself, so it is effected by the 
chip dissipation.
 
    The CAZ type opamps have very greatly reduced  thermal input drifts and 
1/f noise.
 
    The other is the signals derived from external  thermo electric junctions 
and are rarely less than a few micro V / C Deg.  These can be between the 
chip header and the socket or the wiring,  or between cables and the input 
clamps, or even between different cables or  connections. You will see differences 
across the circuit board, if there is a  thermal gradient across it.
 
    Some resistors, like the metal oxide types,  generate high EMFs if there 
is a temperature difference between the two  ends. Don't even try to use 
carbon resistors, either composition or  film. 
 
    It can be an advantage to stick a strip of soft Al  or Cu to the top, or 
even to both sides, of the input amplifier chip and bolt  this onto the outer 
Al Screening Case. Another alternative is to use double  sided circuit board. 
This greatly reduces temperature variations across the  board. You can bolt a 
Cu chip cover strip onto the board. This is  preferable to trying to reduce 
the dissipation by reducing the supply voltage.  Having said this, it may be 
desirable to use separate IC regulators for the  input opamp supply, to give low 
noise and drift and high AC supply  rejection. The first amplifier does need 
very good supply noise decoupling. 
 
    Seismometer amplifiers often have two distinct  gain stages, with a high 
pass filter set to maybe 20 to 30 sec in between.  This will greatly reduce 
thermal error signals and 1/f noise at the output.  For geophone circuits, the 
filter maybe set to 1/10 the resonant  frequency.
 
    The seismometer amplifier case is preferably made  of metal and earthed. 
It should be kept dry, screened from drafts and any  temperature variations 
should be minimised. It can be an advantage to fill  the case with glass wool to 
inhibit convection.
 
    You might include the LF412 for  second amplifiers. They have quite low 
drift.
 
    The INA118 is very useful as a low  noise true differential input opamp. 
 
    For information, noise calculation and  selection of your photo diodes 
See 
_http://usa.hamamatsu.com/assets/applications/SSD/photodiode_technical_information.pdf_ 
(http://usa.hamamatsu.com/assets/applications/SSD/photodiode_technical_information.pdf) 
 
    Regards,
 
    Chris Chapman





In a message dated 10/03/2005 16:11:50 GMT Standard Time,=20 jpopelish@........ writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>Jack=20 Ivey wrote:
> Bret Nordgren wrote:
>> Another factor that y= ou=20 may want to consider is thermal variation.  At very
>> low=20 frequencies, below 1Hz, the effects of micro-variations in the=20 device
>> temperature can add additional "noise".

> I'= ve=20 seen this effect with thermocouple amplifiers, where moving your hand
&= gt;=20 near the circuit would move the air enough to create low-frequency=20 noise.
> It can be almost eliminated by pressing the circuit board=20 between pieces
> of foam rubber.

It also helps a lot to keep=20= the=20 internal temperature rise of the front
end opamp to a minimum. =20 Reducing the opamp supply voltage as much as
possible without degrading= the=20 performance of the amp helps keep the
chip cool and reduce the thermal=20 effect of changes in air currents.

For this reason, if two amp choi= ces=20 have similar noise specs, but one
may be operated at lower supply volta= ge=20 or draws less supply current,
its lower self heating may allow it to ou= t=20 perform its hotter
competition in the low frequency=20 realm.
    Hi John,
 
    Assuming that you are using a 16 bit ADC with a= =20 range of +/-10V, one count is 305 micro volts. Normal amplifier gains can re= sult=20 in very significant count drifts with temperature unless great care is taken= in=20 the design and construction.
 
        There are two different= =20 factors operating here. One is the temperature sensitivity of the opamp inpu= t=20 circuit in micro V / C Deg. Remember that this relates to temperatures=20 on the IC chip itself, so it is effected by the chip dissipation.
 
    The CAZ type opamps have very greatly reduce= d=20 thermal input drifts and 1/f noise.
 
    The other is the signals derived from external=20 thermo electric junctions and are rarely less than a few micro V / C De= g.=20 These can be between the chip header and the socket or the wiring,=20 or between cables and the input clamps, or even between different cable= s or=20 connections. You will see differences across the circuit board, if there is=20= a=20 thermal gradient across it.
 
    Some resistors, like the metal oxide types,=20 generate high EMFs if there is a temperature difference between the two=20 ends. Don't even try to use carbon resistors, either composition or=20 film. 
 
    It can be an advantage to stick a strip of soft= Al=20 or Cu to the top, or even to both sides, of the input amplifier chip and bol= t=20 this onto the outer Al Screening Case. Another alternative is to use double=20 sided circuit board. This greatly reduces temperature variations across the=20 board. You can bolt a Cu chip cover strip onto the board. This is=20 preferable to trying to reduce the dissipation by reducing the supply voltag= e.=20 Having said this, it may be desirable to use separate IC regulators for the=20 input opamp supply, to give low noise and drift and high AC supply=20 rejection. The first amplifier does need very good supply noise decoupl= ing.=20
 
    Seismometer amplifiers often have two distin= ct=20 gain stages, with a high pass filter set to maybe 20 to 30 sec in between.=20 This will greatly reduce thermal error signals and 1/f noise at the out= put.=20 For geophone circuits, the filter maybe set to 1/10 the resonant=20 frequency.
 
    The seismometer amplifier case is preferably ma= de=20 of metal and earthed. It should be kept dry, screened from drafts and any=20 temperature variations should be minimised. It can be an advantage to f= ill=20 the case with glass wool to inhibit convection.
 
    You might include the LF412 fo= r=20 second amplifiers. They have quite low drift.
 
    The INA118 is very useful as a= low=20 noise true differential input opamp. 
 
    For information, noise calculation and=20 selection of your photo diodes See http://usa.hamamatsu.com/assets/applications/SSD/photodio= de_technical_information.pdf
 
    Regards,
 
    Chris Chapman

[ Top ] [ Back ] [ Home Page ]