PSN-L Email List Message

Subject: RE: EMAIL ADDRESS TO REPORT A QUAKE
From: "Steve Hammond" shammon1@.............
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:38:57 -0700


events@..............

Here you go James.

Regards,
 Steve Hammond PSN San Jose, Aptos CA

-----Original Message-----
From: psn-l-request@..............
[mailto:psn-l-request@................. Behalf Of JAMES C. ALLEN
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 7:35 PM
To: psn-l@..............
Subject: Re: EMAIL ADDRESS TO REPORT A QUAKE


Can someone provide me with the email address to report a quake on Larry's
server?
Can someone provide me with the working address to include in the network
lookup table of WinQuake for the NEIC?
Thanks
James Allen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Cochrane" 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: Status of the PSN file format / capacitive measurements


> Hi Rene,
>
> I can answer your first questions. The PSN 3/4 file format is not
> proprietary, so it can be used by any application and WinQuake is not
> open-sourced.
>
> Regards,
> Larry Cochrane
> Redwood City, PSN
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> 2 Questions:
>>    I'd like to know how 'official' the PSN file format is. It is well
>> described, and i'd like to let my measurement equipment also output a PSN
>> file. However, i only seen a few applications that use it (winquake etc),
>> which is a (semi?) commercial/paid application. However, the file format
>> seems standard in the PSN network, so i like to comply to that standard.
>> Is PSN3/4 file format a propierity standard or can it also freely be used
>> by other aplications, and/or is it considered the winquake applications
>> to be open-sourced?
>>
>>   Is there any documentation on using capacitive measurements instead of
>> the coil based ones? So far i saw all lehman-typed instruments equiped
>> with a pickup coil. With my testing equipment i used two capacitor
>> plates, each about 30cm2 large, at about 3-5 mm of eachother. On that is
>> an variabele oscillator attached, with pulse counting i determinate
>> position of the arm with reasonable success but no hard data on
>> resolution. I am wondering if there ary any known disadvantages of such
>> setup, i think it is suitable to build a Shackleford-Gundersen type this
>> way as well.
>>
>> kind regards,
>>
>> rene
>>
>> __________________________________________________________
>>
>> Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
>>
>> To leave this list email PSN-L-REQUEST@.............. with the body of
>> the message (first line only): unsubscribe
>> See http://www.seismicnet.com/maillist.html for more information.
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________
>
> Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
>
> To leave this list email PSN-L-REQUEST@.............. with the body of the
> message (first line only): unsubscribe
> See http://www.seismicnet.com/maillist.html for more information.
>


__________________________________________________________

Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)


__________________________________________________________

Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)


[ Top ] [ Back ] [ Home Page ]