PSN-L Email List Message
Subject: Re: Acouple web images and text of the ball bearings rims support "rods", of ...
From: meredith lamb paleoartifact@.........
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:24:41 -0700
Hi John,
I tried the same setup in September and early October of this year. Try
a smaller ball bearing than the race was made for; that will mean alot less
contact friction. A same size ball bearing as the race, means multiple meta=
l
contacts therein; for both your hinges...and, the different ball
bearing/race
"sections" will have to be set rather precisely (apart) together; otherwise
you get more friction from that (potential offset) stress contact.
I used a more brutal ball bearing "disection" method than you used. A
big vice, will crack small ball bearing assemblys fairly easily, and in
fair alignment with where they contact the vice jaws. Use a cloth, under
and over the bearing assembly before applying pressure. Subsequent
vice pressure can reduce the 1/2 sections, to 1/4 sections fast.
The best ball bearing/s on various mounting surfaces I tried could only
get up to 4 hours of free oscillations, for a 2" mass offset, with it setup
as a hanging vertical pendulum, or S-G. I found that nearly flat ground,
polished glass optical lenses surfaces were better than bearing races
for less friction.
Take care, Meredith Lamb
On 11/5/05, John Popelish wrote:
>
> ChrisAtUpw@....... wrote:
> > The correct reference is:
> >
> > http://home.earthlink.net/~meredithlamb/crbs.html
> >
>
> All this discussion of using parts from ball bearings as hinge
> bearings, and it finally dawns on me that people ate talking about
> everything except the surfaces that are made precisely as low friction
> bearing surfaces.
>
> clip.....
Hi John,
I tried the same setup in September and early October of this year. T=
ry
a smaller ball bearing than the race was made for; that will mean alot less=
contact friction. A same size ball bearing as the race, means multipl=
e metal
contacts therein; for both your hinges...and, the different ball bearing/ra=
ce
"sections" will have to be set rather precisely (apart) together;=
otherwise
you get more friction from that (potential offset) stress contact.
I used a more brutal ball bearing "disection" method than you use=
d. A
big vice, will crack small ball bearing assemblys fairly easily, and in
fair alignment with where they contact the vice jaws. Use a cloth, un=
der
and over the bearing assembly before applying pressure. Subsequent
vice pressure can reduce the 1/2 sections, to 1/4 sections fast.
The best ball bearing/s on various mounting surfaces I tried could only
get up to 4 hours of free oscillations, for a 2" mass offset, with it =
setup
as a hanging vertical pendulum, or S-G. I found that nearly flat grou=
nd,
polished glass optical lenses surfaces were better than bearing races
for less friction.
Take care, Meredith Lamb
On 11/5/05, John Popelish <jpopelish@r=
ica.net> wrote:
ChrisAtUpw@....... wrote:
&nbs=
p; > The correct ref=
erence is:
>
> <=
a href=3D"http://home.earthlink.net/~meredithlamb/crbs.html">http://home.ea=
rthlink.net/~meredithlamb/crbs.html
>
All this discussion of using parts from ball bearings a=
s hinge
bearings, and it finally dawns on me that people ate talking abo=
ut
everything except the surfaces that are made precisely as low frictio=
n
bearing surfaces.
clip.....
[ Top ]
[ Back ]
[ Home Page ]