Folks,

I've noted with amusement the bantering about weights and measures. But =
I'm
not at all amused about the upcoming "event" and its underlying purpose. =
I'd
suggest a quiet-time reading of: "Nuclear Bunker Buster Bombs" by =
Michael
Levy, Scientific American, August, 2004.

http://www.sciamdigital.com/gsp_qpdf.cfm?ISSUEID_CHAR=3DA4AD4ADB-2B35-221=
B-699
D1485A73879AA&ARTICLEID_CHAR=3DA4C0C473-2B35-221B-675DA971076806AD

Then consider the 700-tons of ANFO proposed for the "Divine Strake" test
against the yield (and weight) of the following:

http://www.brook.edu/FP/projects/nucwcost/madm.htm

I don't care what your politics may be, I simply don't trust ANY
administration with deployment of this type of a weapon -- particularly =
when
they preface the name of the test with "Divine" -- talk about holy wars!

Regards,

-Tim-

Timothy Carpenter


-----Original Message-----
From: psn-l-request@.............. [mailto:psn-l-request@............... =
On
Behalf Of ian
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 3:17 PM
To: psn-l@..............
Subject: Re: Man Made Quake

Hi,

you probably meant: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilogram

Ian

J=F3n Fr=EDmann wrote:

>Hi all
>
>At any rate, there is an answer. Here it is,
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilo
>
>Regards.
> =20
>
__________________________________________________________

Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)


__________________________________________________________

Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)