=20
In a message dated 16/06/2006 02:38:54 GMT Daylight Time, =20
geodynamics@....... writes:

According to the  referenced document, dated June 9, it appears DIVINE STRAK=
E=20
has been  indefinitely postponed. Apparently the original =E2=80=9CFinding o=
f No=20
Significant  Impact=E2=80=9D couldn=E2=80=99t stand up to the intense scruti=
ny. There=E2=80=99s no=20
indication of  when the test might be rescheduled =E2=80=93 but it doesn=E2=
=80=99t look like they=E2=80=99
ll meet the  June 23 date. =20
_http://www.nv.doe.gov/library/publications/Environmental/WithdrawalRevisedF=
in
ding.pdf_=20
(http://www.nv.doe.gov/library/publications/Environmental/WithdrawalRevisedF=
inding.pdf)=20


Hi Tim,
=20
    Given that this was to be an underground HE  ammonium nitrate test bast,=
=20
the excuses for cancellation seem to be  false.
=20
    Regards,
=20
    Chris Chapman






In a message dated 16/06/2006 02:38:54 GMT Daylight Time,=20
geodynamics@....... writes:
<=
FONT=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000080 size=
=3D2>
  
According to th=
e=20
  referenced document, dated June 9, it appears DIVINE STRAKE has been=20
  indefinitely postponed. Apparently the original =E2=80=9CFinding of No Sig=
nificant=20
  Impact=E2=80=9D couldn=E2=80=99t stand up to the intense scrutiny. There=
=E2=80=99s no indication of=20
  when the test might be rescheduled =E2=80=93 but it doesn=E2=80=99t look l=
ike they=E2=80=99ll meet the=20
  June 23 date. 
  
http://www.nv.doe.gov/library/publications/Environmenta=
l/WithdrawalRevisedFinding.pdf

Hi Tim,
 
    Given that this was to be an underground HE=20
ammonium nitrate test bast, the excuses for cancellation seem to b=
e=20
false.
 
    Regards,
 
    Chris Chapman