In a message dated 21/01/2007, Bobhelenmcclure@....... writes:


  Sorry, but I will not even think of trying what you  suggest.

Hi Bob,
 
    Entirely your choice! But don't discourage others  from experimenting.

  Nor am I interested in displacement sensing. I tried that a long  time ago, 
and all my dynamic range was used up by uncontrollable tilts  and drift. 


    Which could have told you quite a lot about your  equipment and how to 
improve it? 
    Try LVDT or capacitative detectors some time? You  might like one of them!
    My LVDT seems to work fine. Professional systems  tend to use 
capacitative types.
 
    Regards,
 
    Chris Chapman





In a message dated 21/01/2007, Bobhelenmcclure@....... writes:
<=
FONT=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=
=3D2>
  

  
  Sorry, but I will not even think of trying what you=20
  suggest.
Hi Bob,
 
    Entirely your choice! But don't discourage othe=
rs=20
from experimenting.
<=
FONT=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=
=3D2>
  
  Nor am I interested in displacement sensing. I tried that a lo=
ng=20
  time ago, and all my dynamic range was used up by uncontrollable tilt=
s=20
  and drift. 

    Which could have told you quite a lot about you=
r=20
equipment and how to improve it? 
    Try LVDT or capacitative detectors some time? Y=
ou=20
might like one of them!
    My LVDT seems to work fine. Professional system=
s=20
tend to use capacitative types.
 
    Regards,
 
    Chris Chapman