PSN-L Email List Message

Subject: Re: Orientation of magnet with Lehman setup?
From: "Thomas Dick" dickthomas01@.............
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 09:09:31 -0600


Gentlemen, Chris is right -- the magnet must remain stationary. I am =
living proof. Dr. Peters might escape the common pitfalls in his unique =
lab situation but the "common people" are not going to be that lucky. To =
name some of the things that will distort your data that you probably =
haven't seen. 1. electromagnetic rays from commerical transmitters such =
as CB's going by in cars 200 ft away. Amateur radio equipment as high as =
2 meters and with a power of less than five watts causes "episodes". I =
ran a ten meter repeater here (transmitter put out 250 watts) for 25 yrs =
but seismology put an end to that. My transmitter for operation on all =
bands below ten meters puts out 100 watts and the antennas are full =
sized. I still could distort the data. 2. the normal things (that Chris =
always alludes to); motors, fan blowers, even carpenters using portable =
generators 3. lightning 4. incoming power line noise -- I had my line =
check and you wouldn't believe what was there 5. finally, I am =
absolutely sure that I detected the magnetic disturbance within a =
megacell thunderstorm that brought a F3 tornado within nine miles of my =
location two years ago. Here is one reference (not the best)  =
http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_166b.html . The public was urged =
to use this method in the early days of TV before cable and modern =
tuners -- probably before most of you were borned. It has no value =
today. 6. sun spots - the last two cycles haven't really been "the =
best". Plus there are solar flares. They come and are gone. Oh, yes, I =
even tried metal mesh screening with magnets on the screens to help =







Gentlemen, Chris is right -- the magnet must remain stationary. I = am living=20 proof. Dr. Peters might escape the common pitfalls in his unique lab = situation=20 but the "common people" are not going to be that lucky. To name some of = the=20 things that will distort your data that you probably haven't seen. 1.=20 electromagnetic rays from commerical transmitters such as CB's going by = in cars=20 200 ft away. Amateur radio equipment as high as 2 meters and with a = power of=20 less than five watts causes "episodes". I ran a ten meter repeater here=20 (transmitter put out 250 watts) for 25 yrs but seismology put an end to = that. My=20 transmitter for operation on all bands below ten meters puts out 100 = watts and=20 the antennas are full sized. I still could distort the data. 2. the = normal=20 things (that Chris always alludes to); motors, fan blowers, even = carpenters=20 using portable generators 3. lightning 4. incoming power line noise -- I = had my=20 line check and you wouldn't believe what was there 5. finally, I am = absolutely=20 sure that I detected the magnetic disturbance within a megacell = thunderstorm=20 that brought a F3 tornado within nine miles of my location two years = ago. Here=20 is one reference (not the best)  http://www.str= aightdope.com/classics/a1_166b.html .=20 The public was urged to use this method in the early days of = TV before=20 cable and modern tuners -- probably before most of you were borned. = It has=20 no value today. 6. sun spots - the last two cycles haven't really been = "the=20 best". Plus there are solar flares. They come and are gone. Oh, yes, I = even=20 tried metal mesh screening with magnets on the screens to help shield. = My words,=20 take the road most suggested.

[ Top ] [ Back ] [ Home Page ]