PSN-L Email List Message

Subject: Re: folded pendulum
From: tchannel1@............
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:38:17 -0600


Hi Chris,  All good suggestions!    If I understand you would use the =
Arm for the Mass or the Arm also acts as the mass,
With the mass already centered, you would only need a small amount of =
mass on a threaded rod to tweak the period?
Thank You, Ted
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: ChrisAtUpw@..........
  To: psn-l@.................
  Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 6:45 PM
  Subject: Re: folded pendulum


  In a message dated 2007/06/29, tchannel1@............ writes:


    Hi Folks, I am still experimenting with the basic structure of the =
folded Pendulum linkage. One normal pendulum, one inverted pendulum and =
a horz connecting arm.

    1 I am assuming the length of the two pendulums should be the same =
and as long a practical.  I am thinking of 12 to 18" which would make =
the sensor about 24" to 36" tall.  I may go shorter........


  Hi Ted,

         It very much depends on what maximum period you want? This is =
often 25 to 30 seconds for amateur equipment?

         I suggest that the shortest you consider should be 1 second at =
about 9.8". Above that, what is the maximum framesize that you can =
easily make? Maybe 2 ft square with 3" U channel? With your trial setup, =
you got a period extension of x10. You could probably get x20 fairly =
easily.


    2 I gather the length of the horz connecting arm, should be a long a =
practical.  In that, a longer arm would allow more room along the horz =
plane, on which to tweak the balance.  A too short arm, would make the =
balance point too small.
    I would be using a fine threaded rod with a threaded mass and a =
threaded smaller mass, for extra fine adj.


         I suggest that you make the horizontal connecting arm out of =
brass to form the main mass. Then mount a small 'trim' mass just off =
centre. I don't think that the horizontal arm needs to be more than the =
pendulum length. You are critically dependant on the position of the =
mass to extend the period. Mount the main mass rgidly fixed. Don't mount =
it on threaded rod.


    3 Would such a device still require the same type of enclosure as a =
Lehman or Vertical?


         Yes. It may be convenient to use 1/8" or 3/16" Al alloy plate =
to form the two sides and connect them together with either square rod =
or U channel to support the arms and to give an enclosed box structure. =
Maybe cut a hole in the centre of one plate to mount and adjust the =
sensor and damping components and provide a cover plate?


    4 Would the size of the mass be critical?  I would be using brass or =
SS shim stock at all points for hinges.


         Don't use Brass shim. SS or bronze should be fine. You are very =
dependant on getting good bearings to be able to extend the period. The =
load bearing capacity of the shim stock should be considered when =
deciding on the mass. Don't go above 1/10 the max. rated load stress. =
Consider the handling stresses. Don't make the arms very long and narrow =
- max about 5:1, maybe less? Design in stops to prevent the arm moving =
more than about 1/2" either way.

         Regards,








Hi Chris,  All good=20 suggestions!    If I understand you would use = the Arm for=20 the Mass or the Arm also acts as the mass,
With the mass already centered, you = would only need=20 a small amount of mass on a threaded rod to tweak the = period?
Thank You, Ted
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 ChrisAtUpw@.......
To: psn-l@..............
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 = 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: folded = pendulum

In a=20 message dated 2007/06/29, tchannel1@............=20 writes:

Hi Folks, I am still experimenting with the basic = structure of=20 the folded Pendulum linkage. One normal pendulum, one inverted = pendulum and=20 a horz connecting arm.


1 I am assuming the length of the two pendulums = should be the=20 same and as long a practical.  I am thinking of 12 to 18" which = would=20 make the sensor about 24" to 36" tall.  I may go=20 shorter........

Hi=20 Ted,

       It very much depends = on what=20 maximum period you want? This is often 25 to 30 seconds for amateur=20 equipment?

       I suggest that = the=20 shortest you consider should be 1 second at about 9.8". Above that, = what is=20 the maximum framesize that you can easily make? Maybe 2 ft square with = 3" U=20 channel? With your trial setup, you got a period extension of x10. You = could=20 probably get x20 fairly easily.


2 I=20 gather the length of the horz connecting arm, should be a long a=20 practical.  In that, a longer arm would allow more room along = the horz=20 plane, on which to tweak the balance.  A too short arm, would = make the=20 balance point too small.
I would be using = a fine=20 threaded rod with a threaded mass and a threaded smaller mass, for = extra=20 fine adj.

       I=20 suggest that you make the horizontal connecting arm out of brass to = form the=20 main mass. Then mount a small 'trim' mass just off centre. I don't = think that=20 the horizontal arm needs to be more than the pendulum length. You are=20 critically dependant on the position of the mass to extend the period. = Mount=20 the main mass rgidly fixed. Don't mount it on threaded = rod.

3 Would such a device still require the same type of = enclosure=20 as a Lehman or Vertical?

       Yes. It=20 may be convenient to use 1/8" or 3/16" Al alloy plate to form the two = sides=20 and connect them together with either square rod or U channel to = support the=20 arms and to give an enclosed box structure. Maybe cut a hole in the = centre of=20 one plate to mount and adjust the sensor and damping components and = provide a=20 cover plate?

4 Would the size of the mass be critical?  I would = be using=20 brass or SS shim stock at all points for hinges.

       Don't use = Brass shim.=20 SS or bronze should be fine. You are very dependant on getting good = bearings=20 to be able to extend the period. The load bearing capacity of the shim = stock=20 should be considered when deciding on the mass. Don't go above 1/10 = the max.=20 rated load stress. Consider the handling stresses. Don't make the arms = very=20 long and narrow - max about 5:1, maybe less? Design in stops to = prevent the=20 arm moving more than about 1/2" either=20 way.

      =20 Regards,

       Chris = Chapman=20

[ Top ] [ Back ] [ Home Page ]