All of the discussion about waterfall displays finally moved me to  make up 
WAVE files of my data from the M8.2 Kiril Island event of 01/13/2007. I  used 
Raven to listen to the files and look at the waterfall display. I must say  
that the sound was a lot more interesting than the waterfall display. In my  
experience, waterfall displays for seismic events is underwhelming.
 
  I am willing to send the WAVE files to anybody that might want them.  The 
data was recorded at 5 samples per second. The WAVE file plays back at 8,000  
samples per second, and is about 2 seconds in duration. I am at aol dot  com.
 
---Bob



************************************** Get a sneak peak of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour





  All of the discussion about waterfall displays finally moved me=20=
to=20
make up WAVE files of my data from the M8.2 Kiril Island event of 01/13/2007=
.. I=20
used Raven to listen to the files and look at the waterfall display. I must=20=
say=20
that the sound was a lot more interesting than the waterfall display. In my=20
experience, waterfall displays for seismic events is underwhelming.
 
  I am willing to send the WAVE files to anybody that might want t=
hem.=20
The data was recorded at 5 samples per second. The WAVE file plays back at 8=
,000=20
samples per second, and is about 2 seconds in duration. I am at aol dot=20
com.
 
---Bob


Get a sneak pe=
ak of the all-new AOL.com.
<=
/BODY>