PSN-L Email List Message
Subject: Re: Testing the Folded Pendulum
From: tchannel1@............
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 06:41:01 -0600
Geoffrey, No I have not see it. I will look, Thanks, Ted
----- Original Message -----
From: "Geoffrey"
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 6:29 AM
Subject: Re: Testing the Folded Pendulum
> Have you seen the seismometer they are building for
> a mars mission ? do you think you could duplicate
> one like that ???
> I think it is only horizontal x-y.
>
> regards;
> geoff
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 08:46
> Subject: Testing the Folded Pendulum
>
>
> Hi All, I finished the Folded Pendulum Sensor. I will send pictures to
> anyone interested. After I test it, and if it works, I will then post the
> pictures on the internet, like I did on the "Slinky"
>
> All in all, it was a bit of a bear. I guess the fact it was a new
> concept, for me, and that I could find only a couple examples, was part of
> the issue. Thanks to all who helped me, or I would have never gotten
> this far. At this point it seems to be working, but I can qualify it's
> performance after it is tested.
>
> The two pendulum, one normal, one inverted have the same length, 7.625",
> The box it is contained in is 32"x24".
> The best working natural period I could measure, was about 6 to 10
> seconds. I could obtain 15 seconds but it was too unstable.
> It has been pointed out to me that I should have achieved a longer period
> using this approach. Perhaps other articles and examples may show me how
> to improve the design.
>
> By the way if and when I record earthquakes using the sensor I will post
> them on PSN as TCIDF, for "Folded Pendulum"
> TCIDzs= "Slinky is setting in the corner.
>
> I do have a question about measuring a sensor's period. I assume the best
> way is to remove the damper, tap the arm, and time the cycles.
>
> Q. Is there another way, to estimate its period, with the damper
> installed? On this sensor the damper is difficult to remove.
>
>
> Different Subject
>
> Q. I don't really understand the FFT in AmaSeis. If I take one hour of
> trace, containing road construction noise, and use Control/Fourier
> Transform/Linear, I see a large spike at 1.607Hz another at 2.597Hz and
> some other signals.
> Is this the frequency of the noise?
>
> Q. I highlighted an earthquake, and using the same steps I see a section
> of spikes, starting at .2 and ending at .8Hz
> Is that the frequency of the recorded earthquake?
>
> Thanks Again, Ted
>
> __________________________________________________________
>
> Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
>
> To leave this list email PSN-L-REQUEST@.............. with the body of the
> message (first line only): unsubscribe
> See http://www.seismicnet.com/maillist.html for more information.
__________________________________________________________
Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
[ Top ]
[ Back ]
[ Home Page ]