Hi Dick -

Interesting files.  On the last page, you made a comment about being far
away from TUC, and yes I agree, but there are two stations much closer that
could give you good comparative data if that is what you are looking for.

    Blue Mountain Array, Baker Oregon        US/BMO
    Hailey, Idaho                                       US/HLID

Both of these stations are part of the US array, and shown on the ASL web
site link:

    http://aslwww.cr.usgs.gov/Seismic_Data/heli2_us.shtml

I am not certain what the sensors are.  You can access their data trough
IRIS, and download individual SAC binary files.  Although full header data
is in the files, WinQuake has a problem in reading all of the header, but
displays the seismogram.  You could call them up in WinQuake, and add the
event data to them like you do your own files, and resave them in PSN-4
format or leave them in SAC format.  Either way Winquake will read them.

You also have a STS-1 sensor located at Corvallis, Or.  IU/COR    It is part
of the IU network. 

That should give you three good sensors, all much closer than TUC.

Bob Hancock


On 9/6/07 4:47 AM, "Thomas Dick"  wrote:

> George & Geoff and others this is what I am referring
> to....http://tdick.bachcottage.com/kurilquakePSNfollowup.pdf
> 
> or  http://tdick.bachcottage.com/kurilquakePSNfollowup.doc
> 
> 







Hi Di=
ck -



Interesting files.  On the last page, you made a comment about being f=
ar away from TUC, and yes I agree, but there are two stations much closer th=
at could give you good comparative data if that is what you are looking for.=




    Blue Mountain Array, Baker Oregon    =
;    US/BMO

    Hailey, Idaho       &=
nbsp;            =
;            &nb=
sp;      US/HLID



Both of these stations are part of the US array, and shown on the ASL web s=
ite link:



    http://aslwww.cr.usgs.gov/Seismic_Data/heli2_us.shtml



I am not certain what the sensors are.  You can access their data trou=
gh IRIS, and download individual SAC binary files.  Although full heade=
r data is in the files, WinQuake has a problem in reading all of the header,=
 but displays the seismogram.  You could call them up in WinQuake, and =
add the event data to them like you do your own files, and resave them in PS=
N-4 format or leave them in SAC format.  Either way Winquake will read =
them.



You also have a STS-1 sensor located at Corvallis, Or.  IU/COR  &=
nbsp; It is part of the IU network.  



That should give you three good sensors, all much closer than TUC.



Bob Hancock





On 9/6/07 4:47 AM, "Thomas Dick" <dickthomas01@.............&g=
t; wrote:



George & Geoff and others this is what I am referring to....http://td=
ick.bachcottage.com/kurilquakePSNfollowup.pdf <http://tdick.bachcottage.com=
/kurilquakePSNfollowup.pdf> 

or  http://tdick.bachcottage=
..com/kurilquakePSNfollowup.doc <htt=
p://tdick.bachcottage.com/kurilquakePSNfollowup.doc>