PSN-L Email List Message
Subject: Re: Mass deflection weight test
From: "Jerry Payton" gpayton880@.......
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 18:48:55 -0500
http://www.powerstream.com/Wire_Size.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_wire_gauge
These site may help also.
Regards,
Jerry
----- Original Message -----
From: Geoff
To: psn-l@..............
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: Mass deflection weight test
CRC handbook from the library or possibly arrl.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Lahr"
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: Mass deflection weight test
> That's a good idea. Is there a good wire table on line that can be used?
>
> John
>
> At 12:03 PM 11/1/2007, you wrote:
>>In a message dated 01/11/2007, johnjan@........ writes:
>>There are two issues involved. One is the absolute deflection due to
>>adding a weight and the other is the electronic response, once some
>>motion sensor has been applied.
>>
>>Hi John,
>>
>> I find it easier to cut a measured length of Copper wire and
>> bend it so that it gives a three point contact - a small U loop and
>> a larger U loop at right angles to it. You can look up the weight
>> either in wire tables or by the diameter for that gauge and the
>> density of Copper.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Chris
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
>
> Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
>
> To leave this list email PSN-L-REQUEST@.............. with
> the body of the message (first line only): unsubscribe
> See http://www.seismicnet.com/maillist.html for more information.
>
__________________________________________________________
Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
These site may help also.
Regards,
Jerry
----- Original Message -----=20
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: Mass deflection weight test
CRC handbook from the library or possibly =
arrl.
-----=20
Original Message -----
From: "John Lahr" <johnjan@........>
To: <psn-l@..............>
Sent=
:=20
Thursday, November 01, 2007 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: Mass deflection =
weight=20
test
> That's a good idea. Is there a good wire =
table on=20
line that can be used?
>
> John
>
> At 12:03 =
PM=20
11/1/2007, you wrote:
>>In a message dated 01/11/2007, johnjan@........ =
writes:
>>There are=20
two issues involved. One is the absolute deflection due=20
to
>>adding a weight and the other is the electronic response, =
once=20
some
>>motion sensor has been =
applied.
>>
>>Hi=20
John,
>>
>> I find it easier =
to cut a=20
measured length of Copper wire and
>> bend it so that it gives =
a three=20
point contact - a small U loop and
>> a larger U loop at right =
angles=20
to it. You can look up the weight
>> either in wire tables or =
by the=20
diameter for that gauge and the
>> density of=20
Copper.
>>
>> =20
Regards,
>>
>> Chris
> =
>=20
> =
__________________________________________________________
>=20
> Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
>
> To =
leave=20
this list email PSN-L-REQUEST@...............
with=20
> the body of the message (first line only): unsubscribe
> =
See http://www.seismicnet.co=
m/maillist.html=20
for more=20
information.
>
_________________________________________________=
_________
Public=20
Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
To leave this list email PSN-L-REQUEST@...............
with=20
the body of the message (first line only): unsubscribe
See http://www.seismicnet.co=
m/maillist.html=20
for more information.
[ Top ]
[ Back ]
[ Home Page ]