PSN-L Email List Message

Subject: Re: the design isn't fatally flawed
From: tchannel1@............
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 16:21:25 -0700


Randall,   Please,Where are the pictures posted?  Thanks,=20
Ted
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: meredith lamb=20
  To: psn-l@.................
  Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 4:00 PM
  Subject: Re: the design isn't fatally flawed


  Hi Randall,

  Yes...I admitted earlier in a email that it could work...I was wrong.  =
Good deal on
  getting a model working!  It will be interesting to keep informed of =
this one.

  Meredith Lamb


  On Nov 9, 2007 3:51 PM, Randall Peters  wrote:

    Meredith,
      I'm sorry to disagree with your claim that the idea I posted is =
fatally flawed..
    I just assembled a prototype that does work.  Pictures have been =
posted on the same site previously referenced..=20
    The 'edge' is not the hard tungsten carbide that Charles =
recommended; I used an ordinary razor blade.
    The Q is not great, but you can see there are steel shavings still =
on the magnets.  Also the lever arm needs to be=20
    longer than what I've used (part extending down from the magnets) to =
get a longer period with a bigger mass.  At present, trying to lengthen =
substantially beyond  about 1/2 s pulls the blade off the magnets.
      The reason the mass doesn't 'go down' to a non-operational state =
as you expected is because of the magnets' force on the blade; i.e., it =
is not resting at the center of the magnets.
     Randall










Randall,   Please,Where are = the pictures=20 posted?  Thanks,
Ted
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 meredith lamb
To: psn-l@..............
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 = 4:00=20 PM
Subject: Re: the design isn't = fatally=20 flawed

Hi Randall,
 
Yes...I admitted earlier in a email that it could work...I was=20 wrong.  Good deal on
getting a model working!  It will be interesting to=20 keep informed of this one.
 
Meredith Lamb

On Nov 9, 2007 3:51 PM, Randall Peters <PETERS_RD@..........> = wrote:
Meredith,
 =20 I'm sorry to disagree with your claim that the idea I posted is = fatally=20 flawed..
I just assembled a prototype that does work. =  Pictures have=20 been posted on the same site previously referenced..
The 'edge' = is not=20 the hard tungsten carbide that Charles recommended; I used an = ordinary razor=20 blade.
The Q is not great, but you can see there are steel = shavings still=20 on the magnets.  Also the lever arm needs to be
longer than = what=20 I've used (part extending down from the magnets) to get a longer = period with=20 a bigger mass.  At present, trying to lengthen substantially = beyond=20  about 1/2 s pulls the blade off the magnets.
  The = reason the=20 mass doesn't 'go down' to a non-operational state as you expected is = because=20 of the magnets' force on the blade; i.e., it is not resting at the = center of=20 the magnets.
 Randall



[ Top ] [ Back ] [ Home Page ]