Hi All,

The recent activity in the Jujuy and Antofagasta areas prompted me to =
try and determine a better estimate of the MI MS correction.  I had =
several quakes from about the same area ranging from 5.8 to over 7.7 all =
within several weeks and all relatively south of my north south sensor.  =
As I tried to enter the correction to match published magnitudes I got =
numbers from .00025 down to .00006 to make the various magnitudes match. =
 What type of accuracy should I expect on magnitude using a correction =
like this?  I used unfiltered data.  Should I use a specific filter to =
get a more standard read?








Hi All,
 
The recent activity in the Jujuy and =
Antofagasta=20
areas prompted me to try and determine a better estimate of the MI MS=20
correction.  I had several quakes from about the same area ranging =
from 5.8=20
to over 7.7 all within several weeks and all relatively south of my =
north south=20
sensor.  As I tried to enter the correction to match published =
magnitudes I=20
got numbers from .00025 down to .00006 to make the various magnitudes=20
match.  What type of accuracy should I expect on magnitude using a=20
correction like this?  I used unfiltered data.  Should I use a =

specific filter to get a more standard read?
 
Randy