Hi Chris,
Thanks Chris.  Sounds like a item that should be in the seismometry
"toolbox".

Take care, Meredith

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:56 PM,  wrote:

> In a message dated 2008/06/11, paleoartifact@......... writes:
>
> One more question.  Can the copper tube ID be slightly larger than the
> carbide OD; or, is it not even that critical?
>
>
>
> Hi Meredith,
>
>        It is not too critical, easier if the Cu tube is not a close fit.
>
>        I can buy syringes labelled Fine, Medium and Coarse. The coarse
> gives good results and you can then use another bit of Cu tube with the
> Medium to finish / polish  it.
>
>        Regards,
>
>        Chris
Hi Chris,

Thanks Chris.  Sounds like a item that should be in the seismometry "toolbox".

Take care, Meredith

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:56 PM,  <ChrisAtUpw@.......> wrote:

In a message dated 2008/06/11, paleoartifact@......... writes:




One more question.  Can the copper tube ID be slightly larger than the carbide OD; or, is it not even that critical?




Hi Meredith,



       It is not too critical, easier if the Cu tube is not a close fit. 



       I can buy syringes labelled Fine, Medium and Coarse. The coarse gives good results and you can then use another bit of Cu tube with the Medium to finish / polish  it.



       Regards,



       Chris