PSN-L Email List Message
Subject: RE: Pendulum in a fluid?
From: "Paul Cianciolo" Paulc@........
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:22:54 -0400
I think this would lower the "Q" to a very low value, but not increase the
period significantly.
One newbies opinion
PauLC
W1VLF
http://www.rescueelectronics.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: psn-l-request@.............. [mailto:psn-l-request@.................
Behalf Of tchannel1@............
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 1:44 PM
To: psn
Subject: Pendulum in a fluid?
Hi All, Just a thought...Has anyone explored a simple 36"? pendulum, say
having a 2? second period, then containing the pendulum in a fluid. The
pendulum still should move from side to side, but with a longer period? I
have no idea, how to do this, or what the result would be.
I think the result would be similar to an "oil damper"....but an oil
damper does not change the period, does it?
To ask it in a different way......Picture the 36" vertical pendulum
swinging in a large tube filled with air, Now the same pendulum, but with
the tube filled with water.
Would this change the resulting period?
Thanks, Ted
I =
think this=20
would lower the "Q" to a very low value, but not increase the period=20
significantly.
One =
newbies=20
opinion
Hi All, Just a =
thought...Has anyone=20
explored a simple 36"? pendulum, say having a 2? second period, then=20
containing the pendulum in a fluid. The pendulum still should =
move from=20
side to side, but with a longer period? I have no =
idea, how=20
to do this, or what the result would be.
I think the result would be =
similar to an=20
"oil damper"....but an oil damper does not change the period, does=20
it?
To ask it in a different=20
way......Picture the 36" vertical pendulum swinging in a large tube =
filled=20
with air, Now the same pendulum, but with the tube filled with=20
water.
Would this change the resulting=20
period?
Thanks, =
Ted
[ Top ]
[ Back ]
[ Home Page ]