In a message dated 2008/10/15, paleoartifact@......... writes:

> Its seemingly more likely to instead have the mass underneath the bottom 
> "plate" for perhaps better period adjustment range.  See:
>  http://seismometer.googlepages.com/3wirexsuspension
>  New and "strange" yes, but interesting. 

Hi Meredith,

       I would advise making the twin wires have a wider separation at the 
top than the attachement to the bottom plate. This will tend to inhibit sideways 
motions.

       Regards,

       Chris
        


**************
   
In a me=
ssage dated 2008/10/15, paleoartifact@......... writes:



Its seemingly more likely to in=
stead have the mass underneath the bottom "plate" for perhaps better period=20=
adjustment range.  See:

 http://seis=
mometer.googlepages.com/3wirexsuspension

 New and "strange" yes, but interesting. 




Hi Meredith,



       I would advise making the twin wires ha=
ve a wider separation at the top than the attachement to the bottom plate. T=
his will tend to inhibit sideways motions.



       Regards,



       Chris

        


**************=