PSN-L Email List Message
Subject: Re: Unreported earthquake?
From: Bob Hancock icarus@.........
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 06:24:05 -0700
Hi Ted -
There is more than one way to do this - the easiest would be to look
at your data and compute the incoming ray path. If you have good P &
S waves, you could also get a rough distance from your station.
Another way would be to download the SAC files from HLID and MSO using
the VASE program, which is available through IRIS. You can then
convert them to PSN format through WiNQUAKE, or leave them in SAC
format. Note that WINQUAKE can read a data set in PSN format, but not
in SAC format. With P & S wave data from all three stations, you
could draw the arcs and see where they crossover. That would be more
accurate.
Since the event was visible at both HLID an MSO, I would not be
surprised if the records are updated sometime today.
Bob Hancock
On May 14, 2009, at 5:45 AM, tchannel wrote:
> Hi Bob, Why didn't I think of that? Do you know where I can get
> these two .psn files?
> Thanks, Ted
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bob Hancock
> To: psn-l@..............
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:00 PM
> Subject: Re: Unreported earthquake?
>
> Ted -
>
> This appears to be a local event nearer to HLID than MSO. Was the
> signal strong enough on all three channels that you got a clear
> indication of the P wave first movement. If so, have you plotted
> the incoming ray path to your station.
>
> Bob Hancock
>
>
> On May 13, 2009, at 5:54 PM, tchannel wrote:
>
>> Hailey, Idaho http://mbmgquake.mtech.edu/earthworm/wavef_disp/HLID_SPZ_US.2009051300.gif
>>
>> Missoula, Montana http://mbmgquake.mtech.edu/earthworm/wavef_disp/MSO_SPZ_US.2009051300.gif
>>
>> Very confused..???.
>>
>> I received a signature on all three sensors, Hailey Idaho and
>> Montana received it also....The only event posted was a 5.7m Tonga,
>> but the P arrive one minute too late for this to match.
>>
>> Did anyone get this one?
>>
>> My signal also look too short for that distance, This appears to
>> be much closer than Tonga @5400 miles. Perhaps Idaho, Utah???
>> Sometime the USGS is slow to report Local events.
>>
>> My clock is correct.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Ted
>
>
Hi Ted =
-
There is more than one way to do this - the =
easiest would be to look at your data and compute the incoming ray path. =
If you have good P & S waves, you could also get a rough =
distance from your station. Another way would be to download the =
SAC files from HLID and MSO using the VASE program, which is available =
through IRIS. You can then convert them to PSN format through =
WiNQUAKE, or leave them in SAC format. Note that WINQUAKE =
can read a data set in PSN format, but not in SAC =
format. With P & S wave data from all three stations, you =
could draw the arcs and see where they crossover. That would be =
more accurate.
Since the event was =
visible at both HLID an MSO, I would not be surprised if the records are =
updated sometime today.
Bob =
Hancock
On May 14, 2009, at 5:45 AM, =
tchannel wrote:
Hi Bob, Why didn't I think of that? Do =
you know where I can get these two .psn files?
Thanks, Ted
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 =
11:00 PM
Subject: Re: Unreported =
earthquake?
Ted =
-
This appears to be a local event nearer to =
HLID than MSO. Was the signal strong enough on all three channels =
that you got a clear indication of the P wave first movement. If =
so, have you plotted the incoming ray path to your =
station.
Bob =
Hancock
On May 13, 2009, at 5:54 =
PM, tchannel wrote:
Very confused..???.
I =
received a signature on all three sensors, Hailey Idaho and Montana =
received it also....The only event posted was a 5.7m Tonga, but the P =
arrive one minute too late for this to match.
Did anyone get this one?
My =
signal also look too short for that distance, This appears to be =
much closer than Tonga @5400 miles. Perhaps Idaho, =
Utah??? Sometime the USGS is slow to report Local =
events.
My clock is =
correct.
Thanks,
Ted
=
[ Top ]
[ Back ]
[ Home Page ]