PSN-L Email List Message
Subject: Re: optimal position of magnetic dampter
From: "Geoffrey" gmvoeth@...........
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 22:01:26 -0700
Chris;
Do you really mean Q of 0.7
Which is a Damping of 1/0.7 ?
If I make a filter with a damping
of only 0.7 I get a peak in
the roll off response instead of a Butterworth
profile ?
Regards;
geoff
----- Original Message -----
From:
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: optimal position of magnetic dampter
>
> In a message dated 31/05/2009, rog@.......... writes:
>
> What is the thinking on the optimal position of the magnetic damper (MD)
> along the lower boom?
> It seem by shifting the MD position towards or away from the lower pivot
> one can tune the damping strength.
>
>
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> You need to have as low a vertical force on the bottom suspension as
> practicable. I suggest that you put the mass on the end of the arm and then
> slide the arm over a round horizontal rod until the weight of the mass on
> one side balances the weight of the arm on the other. Mark this point to
> attach the top suspension. Check the photos at
> _http://jclahr.com/science/psn/chapman/school/MKII/index.html_
> (http://jclahr.com/science/psn/chapman/school/MKII/index.html)
> You need the damping fairly close to the mass, but this is not
> critical. But the damping plate DOES need to be lie on the OFFSET line joining the
> centre of mass to the bottom suspension, hence the offset mounting hole in
> the mass. This prevents a quake motion from trying to rotate the mass as
> well as pushing it to one side. Please note that the next modification was
> to fit the sensor block with a V wire top suspension. See
> _http://jclahr.com/science/psn/chapman/2008%20lehman/index.html_
> (http://jclahr.com/science/psn/chapman/2008%20lehman/index.html) This 30 lb fishing trace with looped
> ends worked very well indeed, preventing any rotation of the mass around the
> long axis of the arm.
> Have a look at the damper drawings at
> _http://jclahr.com/science/psn/chapman/lehman/index.html_
> (http://jclahr.com/science/psn/chapman/lehman/index.html) These use a quad NdFeB magnet block. You only have to slide the
> block about 1/2" to 3/4" over the 1" magnets to get the correct damping. You
> adjust the separation of the top and bottom mild steel backing plates to
> set the damping in this range. But you also need to be able to remove the
> damping easily when setting the period and to set the damping afterwards to
> 0.7 critical, hence this layout where the damping block simply slides along
> the baseplate.
> This is a good, compact and easily adjusted design. I can set a period
> of 30 seconds, no problem. The trimming of the height of the arm, setting
> up the period and then setting the damping are all sequential and non
> interacting adjustments.
>
> Regards,
>
> Chris Chapman
>
__________________________________________________________
Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
[ Top ]
[ Back ]
[ Home Page ]