PSN-L Email List Message

Subject: Re: Risk of Large earthquake in Californina!
From: Barry Lotz barry_lotz@.............
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:10:34 -0700 (PDT)


All
I did a study years ago. I won't go into it no. I divided California and we=
stern Nevada into an east and west zone (relating to the two major fault li=
nes). I then plotted energy dissipation related to latitude. If memory serv=
es me well this was an area that was over due. I guess time will tell. I wr=
ote the program in Basic. Maybe I'll dig it up and refresh my memory.
Barry=20
--- On Fri, 10/2/09, Dave Nelson  wrote:

From: Dave Nelson 
Subject: Re: Risk of Large earthquake in Californina!
To: psn-l@..............
Date: Friday, October 2, 2009, 7:08 PM


All.

The region where the quakes are occurring is small=A0 volcanic area . There=
 have been small eruptions and lava flows within the past century. The Chin=
a Lake Navy base in that area=A0 actually has a geothermal power or heating=
 system which exploits heat from below=A0 the lava field . There are small =
cinder cones clearly visible from highway 395 as you drive through the Owen=
s Valley.

However there was a very large quake in that area in 1872 estimated between=
 7.6 and 8.

More likely just a small swarm but who knows .

Dave Nelson

~200Km south






----- Original Message ----- From: "J=F3n Fr=EDmann" 
To: "PSN-Postlist" 
Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 01:52
Subject: Risk of Large earthquake in Californina!


Hi all,

I've been watching the earthquakes that have been happening in
Californina this past minites. This earthquakes look like they are a
pre-earthquake squance to a bigger earthquake. I at least estimate that
to be a higher chance, then it not to be. I would give it about 60%
chance of happening, and about 40% chance of not happening. There is
also a small earthquake pattern that I am seeing on local sensor that
are also giving me the nessary clues to this.

I don't have a time a good timeframe at this momemt. But this might
happen in the next 2 - 180 hours time period. I might get a good time
frame, but I also might not get one at all.

Regards,
-- J=F3n Fr=EDmann

http://www.jonfr.com

__________________________________________________________

Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)



__________________________________________________________

Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)

All
I did a study years ago. I won't go in= to it no. I divided California and western Nevada into an east and west zon= e (relating to the two major fault lines). I then plotted energy dissipatio= n related to latitude. If memory serves me well this was an area that was o= ver due. I guess time will tell. I wrote the program in Basic. Maybe I'll d= ig it up and refresh my memory.
Barry
--- On Fri, 10/2/09, Dave N= elson <davefnelson@.......> wrote:

From: Dave Nelson <davefnelson@.......>
Subject: Re: Risk= of Large earthquake in Californina!
To: psn-l@............. om
Date: Friday, October 2, 2009, 7:08 PM


All.

The region where the quakes are occurring is small  volcanic area . There have been small eruptions and lava flows within the = past century. The China Lake Navy base in that area  actually has a ge= othermal power or heating system which exploits heat from below  the l= ava field . There are small cinder cones clearly visible from highway 395 a= s you drive through the Owens Valley.

However there was a very large= quake in that area in 1872 estimated between 7.6 and 8.

More likely= just a small swarm but who knows .

Dave Nelson

~200Km south<= br>





----- Original Message ----- From: "J=F3n Fr=EDm= ann" <jonfr@.........>
To: "PSN-Postlist" <PSN-L@..............>
Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 01:52=
Subject: Risk of Large earthquake in Californina!


Hi all,

I've been watching the earthquakes that have been happening in=
Californina this past minites. This earthquakes look like they are apre-earthquake squance to a bigger earthquake. I at least estimate thatto be a higher chance, then it not to be. I would give it about 60%
cha= nce of happening, and about 40% chance of not happening. There is
also a= small earthquake pattern that I am seeing on local sensor that
are also= giving me the nessary clues to this.

I don't have a time a good tim= eframe at this momemt. But this might
happen in the next 2 - 180 hours t= ime period. I might get a good time
frame, but I also might not get one = at all.

Regards,
-- J=F3n Fr=EDmann

http://www.jonfr.com

______________= ____________________________________________

Public Seismic Network = Mailing List (PSN-L)

To leave this list email PSN-L-REQUEST@.............. with
the b= ody of the message (first line only): unsubscribe
See http://www.seismicnet.c= om/maillist.html for more information.


_____________________= _____________________________________

Public Seismic Network Mailing= List (PSN-L)

To leave this list email PSN-L-REQUEST@.............. with the body of the message (first line= only): unsubscribe
See http://www.seismicnet.com/maillist.html for more =
[ Top ] [ Back ] [ Home Page ]