As I drove from Half Moon Bay to Santa Cruz this afternoon all the Beaches
along the way were closed and there were some electronic signs saying
Beaches closed due to tsunami. 

Regards, Steve Hammond 

 

From: psn-l-request@.............. [mailto:psn-l-request@............... On
Behalf Of THOMAS DICK
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2010 2:20 PM
To: psn-l@..............
Subject: Re: Chilean earthquakes

 

I still see it on the recent 19:00 UST Valparasio quake...it may be due to
oscillation of crust...this territory is new to me.

----- Original Message -----
From: Barry Lotz 
Date: Saturday, February 27, 2010 12:50
Subject: Re: Chilean earthquakes
To: psn-l@..............

> Thomas
> I was wondering the same thing. I would think the 6.9 event ~1.5 
> hrs later would have showed up.
> 
> Regards
> Barry
> http://www.seismicvault.com
> 
> --- On Sat, 2/27/10, Thomas Dick  
> wrote:
> From: Thomas Dick 
> Subject: Chilean earthquakes
> To: "psn-l@.............." 
> Date: Saturday, February 27, 2010, 8:35 AM
> 
> Has anyone else noticed that the mag 6 plus quakes after the 
> original 8.8 don't seem to be coming through as distinctly as I 
> would expect?
> __________________________________________________________
> 
> Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
> 
> To leave this list email PSN-L-REQUEST@.............. with the 
> body of the message (first line only): unsubscribe
> See http://www.seismicnet.com/maillist.html for more information.
> 














As I drove from Half Moon Bay to Santa Cruz this =
afternoon all
the Beaches along the way were closed and there were some electronic =
signs
saying Beaches closed due to tsunami. 

Regards, Steve Hammond 

 



From:=
 =
psn-l-request@..............
[mailto:psn-l-request@............... On Behalf Of THOMAS =
DICK

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2010 2:20 PM

To: psn-l@..............

Subject: Re: Chilean earthquakes



 

I still see it on the recent 19:00 UST Valparasio =
quake...it
may be due to oscillation of crust...this territory is new to me.



----- Original Message -----

From: Barry Lotz <barry_lotz@.............>

Date: Saturday, February 27, 2010 12:50

Subject: Re: Chilean earthquakes

To: psn-l@..............



> Thomas

> I was wondering the same thing. I would think the 6.9 event ~1.5 =


> hrs later would have showed up.

> 

> Regards

> Barry

> http://www.seismicvault.com

> 

> --- On Sat, 2/27/10, Thomas Dick <dickthomas01@.............> =


> wrote:

> From: Thomas Dick <dickthomas01@.............>

> Subject: Chilean earthquakes

> To: "psn-l@.............." =
<psn-l@..............>

> Date: Saturday, February 27, 2010, 8:35 AM

> 

> Has anyone else noticed that the mag 6 plus quakes after the 

> original 8.8 don't seem to be coming through as distinctly as I =


> would expect?

> __________________________________________________________

> 

> Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)

> 

> To leave this list email PSN-L-REQUEST@.............. with the 

> body of the message (first line only): unsubscribe

> See http://www.seismicnet.com/maillist.html for more =
information.

>