PSN-L Email List Message
Subject: Re: low noise PSD
From: Brett Nordgren brett3nt@.............
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 20:44:38 -0400
Hi Chuck,
An excellent design that Dave Nelson in California came up with from
his satellite days can be seen at:
http://bnordgren.org/seismo/FBV/1043_bridge.pdf note that R1 is
now 4.7K, which works better.
It is not really a PSD design but is acting more like a
switched-capacitor, charge-transfer circuit. The 48pF sensor
capacitors are substantially fully charged during each half cycle,
leaving only short switching transients to be filtered, which is easy
enough to do. In the design as shown, there is a pole in the
baseband response at about 320 Hz. and it gives a sensitivity of
about 1200 V/m. The driven, fixed, sensor plates are on two sides of
a double sided PC board, resulting in a stray capacitance Cc of about
130pF, which doesn't have much effect. The moving, grounded, plates
are above and below the driven plates with a spacing of about 1/32",
making Ca and Cb somewhere around 48pF. The fact that the moving
plates are grounded is a significant advantage in reducing the number
of wires bridging the pivots.
To insure gain stability we use an external clock based on a ceramic
resonator rather than the internal oscillator in the LTC1043.
Tests show that its noise is very nearly as good as some professional
instruments and is significantly better than any sites we have been
able to find.
You can get an idea of its construction and performance at:
http://bnordgren.org/seismo/gif_images.htm
Best regards,
Brett
At 12:07 PM 5/16/2010, you wrote:
>Here's a technical question about seismometer electronics. What
>phase sensitive detector design do you recommend for low noise?
>
>I have built PSDs using an op amp and FET switches (the amp switches
>between gain of +1 and -1). Analog Technology and National Semi
>describe these circuits in application notes. And you can use a
>switch with an instrumentation amp. But these switches produce huge
>high frequency noise pulses that are very difficult to shield out or
>filter out.
>
>You could also use IC multipliers like the AD630 or a Gilbert cell
>multiplier. I have not tried either of these and wonder if they are
>worth the cost and/or trouble of construction.
>
>Any suggestions?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Chuck Burch
>
>
>__________________________________________________________
>
>Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
>
>To leave this list email PSN-L-REQUEST@.............. with the body
>of the message (first line only): unsubscribe
>See http://www.seismicnet.com/maillist.html for more information.
__________________________________________________________
Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
[ Top ]
[ Back ]
[ Home Page ]