A friend sent me a portion of a newsletter form the  Space and Science 
Research Center, apparently a private concern out of  Florida.  The report dealt 
primarily with prediction of agricultural  production vs sunspot activity.  
But what caught my eye was the statement:  "After studying 300-plus years 
of data, an SSRC study also found  decreased solar activity had an 80.6% 
correlation with increased volcanic  activity, and 100% correlation with 
essentially all of the largest U. S.  earthquakes."
I had never heard of such an analogy.  Is this  make believe?
 
Al Hrubetz





A friend sent me a portion of a newsletter for=
m the=20
Space and Science Research Center, apparently a private concern out of=20
Florida.  The report dealt primarily with prediction of agricultural=
=20
production vs sunspot activity.  But what caught my eye was the state=
ment:=20
"After studying 300-plus years of data, an SSRC study also found=
=20
decreased solar activity had an 80.6% correlation with increased volcanic=
=20
activity, and 100% correlation with essentially all of the largest U. S.=
=20
earthquakes."
I had never heard of such an analogy.  Is=
 this=20
make believe?
 
Al Hrubetz
=