Al, Damn lies and statistics are pretty strong words .Yes, it has not been =
empirically proven as you and other gentlemen would say however, do not let=
 strong statements discourage you from bringing information forward for all=
 to see . Time will tell one way or the other. If we ever get a clue as to =
=A0a possible cause of earthquakes it will come forward just like you prese=
nted it . Now just suppose it does turn out to have merit? The person who b=
rought it to the attention of the fraternity will soon be forgotten and a n=
ew individual known to us will quickly take credit for=A0the discovery beca=
use he had=A0known=A0 it all along=A0=0A=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Honest John PS, A prophet is =
without honor in his own country ( Jesus Christ)=0A=0A=0A=0A_______________=
_________________=0AFrom: "AHrubetz@......." =0ATo: psn-l=
@...................... Wed, June 16, 2010 6:48:59 PM=0ASubject: SOLAR ACTI=
VITY VS. EARTHQUAKES=0A=0AA friend sent me a portion of a newsletter form t=
he Space and Science Research Center, apparently a private concern out of F=
lorida.=A0 The report dealt primarily with prediction of agricultural produ=
ction vs sunspot activity.=A0 But what caught my eye was the statement: "Af=
ter studying 300-plus years of data, an=A0SSRC study also found decreased s=
olar activity had an 80.6% correlation with increased volcanic activity, an=
d 100% correlation with essentially all of the largest U. S. earthquakes."=
=0AI had never heard of such an analogy.=A0 Is this make believe?=0A=0AAl H=
=0A
Al, Damn lies and statistics are pretty s=
trong words .Yes, it has not been empirically proven as you and other gentl=
emen would say however, do not let strong statements discourage you from br=
inging information forward for all to see . Time will tell one way or the o=
ther. If we ever get a clue as to  a possible cause of earthquakes it =
will come forward just like you presented it . Now just suppose it does tur=
n out to have merit? The person who brought it to the attention of the frat=
ernity will soon be forgotten and a new individual known to us will quickly=
 take credit for the discovery because he had known  it all
 along 
          =
;            &n=
bsp;            =
;            &n=
bsp;            =
;            &n=
bsp;            =
;            &n=
bsp;    Honest John PS, A prophet is without honor in his ow=
n country ( Jesus Christ)
=0A

=0A
=0A
=0AFrom=
: "AHrubetz@......." <AHrubetz@.......>
To: psn-l@..............
Sent: Wed, June 16, 2010 6:48:59 PM
<=
B>Subject: SOLAR ACTIVITY VS. =
EARTHQUAKES

=0A
A friend sent me a portion of =
a newsletter form the Space and Science Research Center, apparently a priva=
te concern out of Florida.  The report dealt primarily with prediction=
 of agricultural production vs sunspot activity.  But what caught my e=
ye was the statement: "After studying 300-plus years of data, an S=
SRC study also found decreased solar activity had an 80.6% correlation with=
 increased volcanic activity, and 100% correlation with essentially all of =
the largest U. S. earthquakes."
=0A
<=
FONT size=3D4>I had never heard of such an analogy.  Is this make beli=
eve?
=0A
 
=0A
Al Hrubetz

[ Top ] 
[ Back ] 
[ Home Page ]