PSN-L Email List Message
Subject: Re: C-Spring Sensor - 5/6 Second Period
From: Geoffrey gmvoeth@...........
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:37:50 +0000
Me Thinks, the seismometer graph
to be wrong for the electrical velocity characteristics
which will show at the output terminals.
Me thinks, the that given the very same
amplitude but increasing frequency that the
voltage should be increasing like N=1
above resonance since voltage and
velocity are related.
Me thinks, You will end up with a dead spot at resonance using
this seismometer response to design your circuit.
not really a dead spot but you will see
a reduction at the noise level there
instead of being steady across resonance.
It is my opinion (I don’t really have to say that)
you would like to see a steady noise level at all frequencies.
if possible.
Or so, me thinks.
geoff
-----Original Message-----
From: Kay Wyatt
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 7:10 PM
To: psnlist@..............
Subject: Re: C-Spring Sensor - 5/6 Second Period
Hi Chris,
Thanks for sending information on imnproving the C-Spring Sensor. Just a quick correction on the link to Robert's circuit for
extending the period of geophones. Leave out the "epics" part of your link.
http://www.jclahr.com/science/psn/roberts/index.html
How would you compare the C-Spring sensor to an AS-1 type vertical seismometer modified with either a "piano wire hinge" or a razer
blade hinge clamped at both ends?
Kay
----- Original Message -----
From: Christopher Chapman
To: psnlist@..............
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 7:31 AM
Subject: Re: C-Spring Sensor - 5/6 Second Period
Subject: C-Spring Sensor - 5/6 Second Period
Has anyone tried this one? A vertical with a 5 to 6 second period using two hacksaw blades. Would like to hear opinions as to
whether this is a worth-while build.
http://www.fairpoint.net/~sparksite/CSpring%20Printer.html
Hi Richard,
This is an old design. Never use oil damping. It is non linear both with period and with amplitude. It is hideously temperature
sensitive and it is not easy to adjust..
There is a design for a magnetic damper for a vertical seismometer at
www.jclahr.com/science/psn/chapman/as1%20damping/index.html Mount the 1/16" thick copper damping blade on the arm and put the quad
damping magnet block on the base. You can use soft Aluminum sheet for the blade - if you can buy it - NOT hard or alloy sheet - but
copper is better, since it is not significantly diamagnetic.
Buy fully hardened hacksaw blades.The ordinary ones have a hardened edge, but with a softer blade. Grind off both the teeth and
the wavy bends on the base, otherwise you get cracks developing quite rapidly when the blade is stressed.
DON'T mount a magnet on a seismometer arm. It picks up noise from the Earth's magnetic field, current surges in the house
wiring, the movement of large vehicles, etc. Mount the pickup coil on the arm and use a shielded quad NdFeB magnet block, or use an
optical position detector.
The response can easily be extended to over 20 seconds using Robert's circuit for extending the period of geophones. You can get
a x10 period extension before running into sensor / amplifier noise, but it does mean that you have to build your own specialised
amplifier - not too difficult to do using stripboard? See www.jclahr.com/science/psn/epics/roberts/index.html
Do look through the articles on the jclahr website.
Regards,
Chris Chapman
__________________________________________________________
Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSNLIST)
To leave this list email PSNLIST-REQUEST@.............. with
the body of the message (first line only): unsubscribe
See http://www.seismicnet.com/maillist.html for more information.
[ Top ]
[ Back ]
[ Home Page ]