PSN-L Email List Message

Subject: Re: Springs and Gravity or Magnitism
From: Christopher Chapman chrisatupw@.......
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 14:12:58 -0400 (EDT)





Subject: Re: Springs and Gravity or Magnitism


Subject: Re: Springs and Gravity or Magnitism
Hello Chris,
It is my guess by what you say it may be possible to create a spring with=
=20
just about any relationship like fitting the curve of force like any graph=
=20
of a conic section ?
.
i Geoff,
    Probably up to cubic over small ranges.
.
I understand magnetic attraction to be log base two ?
ouble the distance and divide the force by four ?
Same with electrostatic ??
    No, It's more complicated. You have two poles on every magnet. The=20
force between any two poles is inverse square law, but the force on a=20
magnet involves both poles. So there may be a rotational as well as a=20
linear forces.=20


   Regards,=20
=20
    Chris



= Subject: Re: Springs and Gravity or Magnitism

Subjec=
t: Re: Springs and Gravity or Magnitism

Hello Chris,

It is my guess by what you say it may be possible to =
create a spring with 
just about any relationship like fitting the curve of force li=
ke any graph 
of a conic section ?
.
Hi Geoff,
    Probably up to cubic over small ranges.
.
I understand magnetic attraction to be log bas=
e two ?
Double the distance and divide the force by four ?

Same with electrostatic ??

    No, It's more complicated. You have two poles on every m=
agnet. The 
force between any two poles is inverse square law, but the force on a =
magnet i=
nvolves both poles. So there may be a rotational as well as a <=
/PRE>
linear forces. 


=20
    Regards, 
 
<=
TT>    Chris

[ Top ] [ Back ] [ Home Page ]