PSN-L Email List Message

Subject: concerning force balance
From: Randall Peters PETERS_RD@..........
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:11:26 -0400


Brett,
       I found the following statement by Erhard W. in his online publicati=
on, in the Velocity broadband seismometers  section of "Seismic sensors a=
nd their calibration":

As far as the response is concerned, a force-balance circuit as described h=
ere may be seen as a means to convert a moderately stable short- to medium-=
period suspension into a stable electronic long-period or very-long-period =
seismometer. The corner period may be increased by a large factor, for exam=
ple 24-fold (from 5 to 120 sec) in the Streckeisen STS2 seismometer or even=
 200-fold (from 0.6 to 120 sec) in a version of the Guralp CMG3. But this f=
actor is not necessarily a figure of merit. Feedback does not reduce the in=
strumental noise; according to section 3.2, short-period suspensions m=
ust be combined with extremely sensitive transducers for a satisfactory sen=
sitivity at long periods.

Assuming the comments you just posted are (mostly) correct, and that this q=
uote of his is also correct-then does not this imply that a good 'soft' spr=
ing is an important part of making a user-friendly-for-construction instrum=
ent?   I interpret his statement to mean that 'herculean' efforts in the re=
alm of sensor/transducer and electronics would be necessary for the Mettler=
 balance to ever work as desired for seismic purposes.

Randall

Brett,

       I found the = following statement by Erhard W. in his online publication, in the Velocity broa= dband seismometers  section of “Seismic sensors a= nd their calibration”:

 =

As far as the response is concerned, a force-balance circuit = as described here may be seen as a means to convert a moderately stable sho= rt- to medium-period suspension into a stable electronic long-period or ver= y-long-period seismometer. The corner period may be increased by a large fa= ctor, for example 24-fold (from 5 to 120 sec) in the Streckeisen STS2 seism= ometer or even 200-fold (from 0.6 to 120 sec) in a version of the Guralp CM= G3. But this factor is not necessarily a figure of merit. Feedback does not= reduce the instrumental noise; according to section = 3.2, short-period suspensions = must be combined with extremely sensitive transducers for a satisfactory se= nsitivity at long periods.

 <= /o:p>

Assuming the comments you just posted are (most= ly) correct, and that this quote of his is also correct—then does not= this imply that a good ‘soft’ spring is an important part of m= aking a user-friendly-for-construction instrument?   I interpret his statement to mean that &= #8216;herculean’ efforts in the realm of sensor/transducer and electr= onics would be necessary for the Mettler balance to ever work as desired fo= r seismic purposes.

 

Randall

=

[ Top ] [ Back ] [ Home Page ]