Hello=2C Hopefully this will be my first successful post to the list!  I wa=
s wondering what would be some of the benefits of using a 1 or 2Hz geophone=
 vice a 4.5 geophone in terms of detecting seismic events.  I understand th=
at the lower resonance frequency of the 2Hz should help but I have no idea =
how to quantify the differences.  Could anyone take a few moments and expou=
nd on what they thought could be gained by going from a 4.5Hz geophone to a=
 2Hz geophone?  Of course the one negative thing is the cost!! =3B)  Thanks=
 for your time! v/r Mike Brown 		 	   		  =








Hello=2C
 =3B
Hopefully this will be my first successful post to =
the list! =3B I was wondering what would be =3Bsome of the benefits=
 of using a 1 or =3B2Hz geophone vice a 4.5 geophone in terms of detect=
ing seismic events. =3B I understand that the lower resonance frequency=
 of the 2Hz should help but I have no idea how to quantify the differences.=
 =3B Could anyone take a few moments and expound on what they thought c=
ould be =3Bgained by going =3Bfrom a 4.5Hz =3Bgeophone to a 2Hz=
 geophone? =3B Of course the one negative thing is the cost!! =3B) =
=3B Thanks for your time!
 =3B
v/r
 =3B
Mike Brown
 =
		 	   		  
=