Hello=2C
=20
Hopefully this will be my first successful post to the list!   I was wonder=
ing what would be some of the benefits of using a 1 or 2Hz geophone vice a =
4.5 geophone in terms of detecting seismic events.   I understand that the =
lower resonance frequency of the 2Hz should help but I have no idea how to =
quantify the differences.   Could anyone take a few moments and expound on =
what they thought could be gained by going from a 4.5Hz geophone to a 2Hz g=
eophone?  Of course the one negative thing is the cost!! =3B)  Thanks for y=
our time!
=20
v/r
=20
Mike Brown

 		 	   		  =












Hello=2C
 
Hopefully this will be my first successful post to the lis=
t!  =3B I was wondering what would be some of the benefits of using a 1=
 or 2Hz geophone vice a 4.5 geophone in terms of detecting seismic events. =
 =3B I understand that the lower resonance frequency of the 2Hz should =
help but I have no idea how to quantify the differences.  =3B Could any=
one take a few moments and expound on what they thought could be gained by =
going from a 4.5Hz geophone to a 2Hz geophone?  Of course the one negative =
thing is the cost!! =3B)  Thanks for your time!
 
v/r
 
Mike Br=
own

 		 	   		  
=