PSN-L Email List Message
Subject: Re: later arrival of waves
From: Dave Nelson dave.nelson@...............
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:49:34 +1100
Hi Randall,
Thanks for that link, some interesting info and
more confirmation :)
This is something I have yet to notice on any of the quakes I have
so far recorded, so
will have to keep a closer eye on the larger events, specially ones at a
large distance from me.
Because the closer events .. any in the SW/ West Pacific region are still
going to be producing
a significant signal after an hour or so and will swamp any small waves
coming from around the
world in the opposite direction.
It seems to me that you guys in the USA are in a good place to look for
this feature from
in the western Pacific where the ratio of the surface wave path distances
are roughly 1/3 : 2/3
for waves coming in either direction. For us guys over this part of the
world, NZ, Australia etc
then we should be looking for these waves from large events in the Nth,
Cntrl and Sth America
region.
cheers
Dave
At 03:21 PM 11/03/2012 -0500, you wrote:
Geoffrey,
There was a great example and explanation of the multiple occurrence of
surface waves a few years ago. I have pasted the info
below.
Subject:
Love waves from Mw 8.0
From: sean@...........
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 23:07:05 -0600 (CST)
An interesting observation in the data
from the Mw 8.0 quake in
P.N.G. near Rabaul on November 16:
For those of you operating long period
horizontal seismometers,
with digital recording, so you can see the time series in a
relatively
compressed form (on a drum or helical record the waves from
successive
rotations are seriously scrambled, especially with the Mw 7.7 second
event.)
The event generated a very impressive set of
Love waves that are
seen in the data of a horizontal sensor whose sensitive axis is normal
to a line drawn toward the source. This is an SH type surface wave
whose
group velocity equals its phase velocity so it does not disperse
or spread out as it travels over the surface of the earth. That is,
repeated occurrences of it are very similar, and are labeled G1,
G2,
G3, etc, for repeat appearances traveling in the same direction.
For this large quake, the mechanism was
such that a large Love
wave was generated propagating out both directions. From my
station,
very little Raleigh wave is evident on the vertical record. The first
Love wave arrival at CCM is at 0542 Z, 48 minutes after the origin time
of 0454. This would be the direct wave from the event. It has a
period of about 80 seconds and a P-P amplitude of 320
microns/second
on the North-South record, and about 110 microns/sec on the EW
record.
(meaning that the displacement here at St. Louis was about 4 mm ).
It has traveled about 12 500 km, which is consistent with a
velocity
of 4.36 km/second for the shear wave at the surface.
The wave that went the "long
way" around the earth arrived at 0639z,
or 57 minutes after the direct wave, and 105 minutes after the
quake.
Its amplitude is about 150 microns/second.
Then the second occurrence of the direct
wave arrives at 0813z, having
gone around the earth once in 151 minutes, implying that the
circumference
of the earth is 39 500 km: approximately, as are my time values. Then the
second arrival of the "long way" wave arrives at 0909z, again
57 minutes
after the second direct wave. A these are clearly distinct (and at the
wrong time) to be associated with the Mw 7.7, which has a very weak Love
wave.
Regards,
Sean-Thomas
[ Top ]
[ Back ]
[ Home Page ]