Gary Lindgren gel@................. Sent: Tue, 8 May 2012 5:26 Subject: RE: Time domain switches for earthquake detection There is not much information, I tried, but here is the chip he is talking = about. http://www.lumedynetechnologies.com/Accelerometer.html It has 20 bit= accuracy so it must have digital output. The picture shows 24 pins. I thin= k one of the applications could some sort of inertial navigation system. It= could be very simple. And we could use it in seismometer sensor. I couldn'= t find any application information online and I sent the company an e-mail = requesting information but no reply yet. Gary =20 Hi Gary, =20 Thanks. I could not find a data sheet or anything giving information on= how it works. Several of the on-line references on the site seem to have b= een removed. Did you have any success ? =20 This looks like the patent, US6,763,718, using Google patent search.=20 The previous types of MEMS accelerometer were high g range devices and = did not give the low noise performance necessary for detecting earthquakes7= - they are maybe only useful for very strong motion detectors. =20 =20 The problems with 1/f amplifier noise were mentioned in the talk. See h= ttp://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/nca/seminars/2012-04-25/ I wonder if Ern= ie Major knew that chopper amplifiers are immune to this ? Probably not. =20 DigiKey sell 44mm OD piezo buzzer disks 102-1170-ND for $1.51. You can = make a very sensitive accelerometer with a 1 oz mass, working out to 4 seco= nds period. These give a higher output voltage than a geophone. See http:/= /www.jclahr.com/science/psn/chapman/piezo/index.html=20 Regards, Chris Chapman= Gary Lindgren gel@................. m
Sent: Tue, 8 May 2012 5:26
Subject: RE: Time domain switches for earthquake detection
There= is not much information, I tried, but here is the chip he is talking about= .. http://www.lumedynetechnologies.com/Accelerometer.html= It has 20 bit accuracy so it must have digital output. The picture shows 2= 4 pins. I think one of the applications could some sort of inertial navigat= ion system. It could be very simple. And we could use it in seismometer sen= sor. I couldn't find any application information online and I sent the comp= any an e-mail requesting information but no reply yet.GaryHi Gary,Thanks. I could not find a data s= heet or anything giving information on how it works. Several of the on-line= references on the site seem to have been removed. Did you have any success= ?This looks like the patent, US6,7= 63,718, using Google patent search.The previous types of MEMS accele= rometer were high g range devices and did not give the low noise perfo= rmance necessary for detecting earthquakes7 - they are maybe only useful fo= r very strong motion detectors.The problems with 1/f amplif= ier noise were mentioned in the talk. See http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/nca/seminars/2012-04-25/&= nbsp;I wonder if Ernie Major knew that chopper amplifiers are immune to thi= s ? Probably not.DigiKey sell 44mm OD piezo b= uzzer disks 102-1170-ND for $1.51. You can make a very sensitive = accelerometer with a 1 oz mass, working out to 4 seconds period. These = ;give a higher output voltage than a geophone. See http://www.jclahr= ..com/science/psn/chapman/piezo/index.htmlRegards,Chris Chapman