Gary Lindgren gel@.................
Sent: Tue, 8 May 2012 5:26
Subject: RE: Time domain switches for earthquake detection
There is not much information, I tried, but here is the chip he is talking =
about. http://www.lumedynetechnologies.com/Accelerometer.html It has 20 bit=
accuracy so it must have digital output. The picture shows 24 pins. I thin=
k one of the applications could some sort of inertial navigation system. It=
could be very simple. And we could use it in seismometer sensor. I couldn'=
t find any application information online and I sent the company an e-mail =
requesting information but no reply yet.
Gary
=20
Hi Gary,
=20
Thanks. I could not find a data sheet or anything giving information on=
how it works. Several of the on-line references on the site seem to have b=
een removed. Did you have any success ?
=20
This looks like the patent, US6,763,718, using Google patent search.=20
The previous types of MEMS accelerometer were high g range devices and =
did not give the low noise performance necessary for detecting earthquakes7=
- they are maybe only useful for very strong motion detectors. =20
=20
The problems with 1/f amplifier noise were mentioned in the talk. See h=
ttp://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/nca/seminars/2012-04-25/ I wonder if Ern=
ie Major knew that chopper amplifiers are immune to this ? Probably not.
=20
DigiKey sell 44mm OD piezo buzzer disks 102-1170-ND for $1.51. You can =
make a very sensitive accelerometer with a 1 oz mass, working out to 4 seco=
nds period. These give a higher output voltage than a geophone. See http:/=
/www.jclahr.com/science/psn/chapman/piezo/index.html=20
Regards,
Chris Chapman
=
Gary Lindgren gel@.................
m
Sent: Tue, 8 May 2012 5:26
Subject: RE: Time domain switches for earthquake detection
There=
is not much information, I tried, but here is the chip he is talking about=
.. http://www.lumedynetechnologies.com/Accelerometer.html=
It has 20 bit accuracy so it must have digital output. The picture shows 2=
4 pins. I think one of the applications could some sort of inertial navigat=
ion system. It could be very simple. And we could use it in seismometer sen=
sor. I couldn't find any application information online and I sent the comp=
any an e-mail requesting information but no reply yet.
Gary
Hi Gary,
Thanks. I could not find a data s=
heet or anything giving information on how it works. Several of the on-line=
references on the site seem to have been removed. Did you have any success=
?
This looks like the patent, US6,7=
63,718, using Google patent search.
The previous types of MEMS accele=
rometer were high g range devices and did not give the low noise perfo=
rmance necessary for detecting earthquakes7 - they are maybe only useful fo=
r very strong motion detectors.
The problems with 1/f amplif=
ier noise were mentioned in the talk. See http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/nca/seminars/2012-04-25/&=
nbsp;I wonder if Ernie Major knew that chopper amplifiers are immune to thi=
s ? Probably not.
DigiKey sell 44mm OD piezo b=
uzzer disks 102-1170-ND for $1.51. You can make a very sensitive =
accelerometer with a 1 oz mass, working out to 4 seconds period. These =
;give a higher output voltage than a geophone. See http://www.jclahr=
..com/science/psn/chapman/piezo/index.html
Regards,
Chris Chapman