On 6/15/2012 5:38 PM, Bryan Goss wrote:
>
>
>   Debate over fracking, quakes gets louder
>
> By *Matt Smith*and *Thom Patterson*, CNN
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/15/us/fracking-earthquakes/index.html?hpt=hp_c2
>
Good article. It also addresses the disposal of wastes into crustal 
space. I might have jumped to conclusion that it was a fracting/fracking 
issue this time. This could be a disposal issue. I always looked at the 
quality rating 
fromhttp://folkworm.ceri.memphis.edu/recenteqs/Quakes/usb000agbp.html 
focuses of less than 7 km and a quality rating of fair to poor is what I 
use. If a lot of the wave phases are missing there has to be a human 
reason. It is going to get harder to generalize. I understand depths of 
15000ft will come soon.

  
    
  
  
    On 6/15/2012 5:38 PM, Bryan Goss wrote:
    

      
      

        

        
        
Debate over
            fracking, quakes gets louder
        
        
        
By
          Matt
              Smith and Thom Patterson, CNN

            

http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/15/us/fracking-earthquakes/index.html?hpt=hp_c2

            

          
      
    
    Good article. It also addresses the disposal of wastes into crustal
    space. I might have jumped to conclusion that it was a
    fracting/fracking issue this time. This could be a disposal issue. I
    always looked at the quality rating from
      http://folkworm.ceri.memphis.edu/recenteqs/Quakes/usb000agbp.html
    focuses of less than 7 km and a quality rating of fair to poor is
    what I use. If a lot of the wave phases are missing there has to be
    a human reason. It is going to get harder to generalize. I
    understand depths of 15000ft will come soon.