PSN-L Email List Message
Subject: Re: Omnidirectional instrument
From: chrisatupw@.......
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 07:37:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Geoff 
To: psnlist 
Sent: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 6:40
Subject: Re: Omnidirectional instrument
             =20
On 12/31/2012 11:32 AM,      Tangazazen@....... wrote:
   =20
   =20
                         =20
Hi Geoff,
       =20
=20
       =20
Curiously enough I was interested at one time in a omni          directiona=
l seismometer but also wanted directional          information. What I ende=
d up with was a pendulum with 2          degrees of freedom which via a qua=
drant photo cell resolved           the N-S,  E-W  component independently.=
=20
       =20
       =20
       =20
       =20
Regards Martin
                                 =20
    I like the photocell idea also i guess i might try a CdS photo resistiv=
e element.
   =20
Hi Geoff,
    CdS photocells do not have the linearity, the temperature coefficient, =
or the frequency=20
response to work well and you can't buy matched pairs. You would be wasting=
 your time,=20
money and effort !=20
    I have used inexpensive BPW34 Silicon photocells to give a resolution=
=20
of about 14 nano metres in a seismic sensor.  =20
    Regards,=20
    Chris Chapman
 =20
=20
=20
From: Geoff <gmvoeth@gma=
il.com>
To: psnlist <psnlist@..............>
Sent: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 6:40
Subject: Re: Omnidirectional instrument
 =20
   =20
 =20
 =20
   =20
    
     =20
     =20
      
       =20
Hi Geoff,
       =20
 
       =20
Curiously enough I was interested at one time in a omni
          directional seismometer but also wanted directional
          information. What I ended up with was a pendulum with 2
          degrees of freedom which via a quadrant photo cell resolved 
          the N-S,  E-W  component independently. 
        
       =20
        
       =20
Regards Martin
       =20
       =20
       =20
      
    
    I like the photocell idea also i guess i might try a CdS photo resistiv=
e element.
    
Hi Geoff,
    CdS photocells do not have the linearit=
y, the temperature coefficient, or the frequency 
response to work well and you can't buy matched pairs. You would be wasting=
 your time, 
money and effort =
! 
    I have used inexpe=
nsive BPW34 Silicon photocells to give a resolution 
of about 14 nano metres in a seismic sensor.  =
 
    Regards, 
    Chris Chapman
 =20
 
 
 
 
 
 
[ Top ] 
[ Back ] 
[ Home Page ]