Because earth velocity increases with depth, and seismic waves take the "least time" path (simplification), P and S waves approach your seismometer at near-vertical incident angle. Since S waves vibrate perpendicular to travel direction, the ground motion is mostly horizontal. P waves have longitudinal ("push-pull") ground motion, which is mostly vertical. Hope that helps. Jud On Jun 7, 2013 1:37 PM, "Geoff"wrote: > On 2013/6/6 11:35 PM, Dave Nelson wrote: > > > Hi Jim, > > Now that little gem of info has answered the question I have had for years > > of course it now begs another question .... > Why do P waves have a larger vertical component than S waves ? > > Dave > > > > SNIP...... > Now usually the P wave has more V motion, so you might not get much P, > from a Horizontal component. > > <<< Jim > > Also a question , Could it be somehow due to to the fact the S wave is > side to side instead of front to back ? > Because earth velocity increases with depth,=A0 and seismic = waves take the "least time" path (simplification), P and S waves = approach your seismometer at near-vertical incident angle.=A0 Since S waves= vibrate perpendicular to travel direction,=A0 the ground motion is mostly = horizontal. P waves have longitudinal ("push-pull") ground motion= , which is mostly vertical.
Hope that helps.
Jud
On Jun 7, 2013 1:37 PM, "Geoff" <gmvoeth@.........> wrote:=20 =20 =20On 2013/6/6 11:35 PM, Dave Nelson wrote:
Also a question , Could it be somehow due to to the fact the S wave is side to side instead of front to back ?
Hi Jim,
Now that little gem of info has answered the question I have had for years
of course it now begs another question ....
Why do P waves have a larger vertical component than S waves ?
Dave
SNIP......
Now usually the P wave has more V=A0 motion, so you might not get much P, from a Horizontal component.
<<<=A0=A0=A0 Jim