Because earth velocity increases with depth, and seismic waves take the
"least time" path (simplification), P and S waves approach your seismometer
at near-vertical incident angle. Since S waves vibrate perpendicular to
travel direction, the ground motion is mostly horizontal. P waves have
longitudinal ("push-pull") ground motion, which is mostly vertical.
Hope that helps.
Jud
On Jun 7, 2013 1:37 PM, "Geoff" wrote:
> On 2013/6/6 11:35 PM, Dave Nelson wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Now that little gem of info has answered the question I have had for years
>
> of course it now begs another question ....
> Why do P waves have a larger vertical component than S waves ?
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> SNIP......
> Now usually the P wave has more V motion, so you might not get much P,
> from a Horizontal component.
>
> <<< Jim
>
> Also a question , Could it be somehow due to to the fact the S wave is
> side to side instead of front to back ?
>
Because earth velocity increases with depth,=A0 and seismic =
waves take the "least time" path (simplification), P and S waves =
approach your seismometer at near-vertical incident angle.=A0 Since S waves=
vibrate perpendicular to travel direction,=A0 the ground motion is mostly =
horizontal. P waves have longitudinal ("push-pull") ground motion=
, which is mostly vertical.
Hope that helps.
Jud
On Jun 7, 2013 1:37 PM, "Geoff" <gmvoeth@.........> wrote:
=20
=20
=20
On 2013/6/6 11:35 PM, Dave Nelson
wrote:
Hi Jim,
Now that little gem of info has answered the question I have had
for
years
of course it now begs another question ....
Why do P waves have a larger vertical component than S waves ?
Dave
SNIP......
Now usually the P wave has more V=A0 motion, so you might not get
much
P, from a Horizontal component.
<<<=A0=A0=A0
Jim
Also a question , Could it be somehow due to to the fact the S wave
is side to side instead of front to back ?